ANACS lists this as a type 1 planchet, for which there is no such thing. Did they mean type 1 blank? If so, why do i think i see a rim on the reverse at the top? But if they meant type 2 planchet, why would they put that on the label as 99.9% of coins are struck on planchets? What do you guys think? Is this struck on a blank? I don't think it is.
I think that I see an upset rim. But kind of wondering if it is only partial. Being a coin struck out of the collar, makes it hard to tell.
That's an old ANACS slab.. They made mistakes on their labels at that time. If it is Broadstruck and that side of the Blank was struck then it would of forced the edge upwards. Just my thinking.
If that side of the blank was struck? I don't understand what you mean. I have many coins struck on blanks, and many of them are broadatrikes. You can always tell very clearly that rims are missing.
Sorry, but I believe blanks and planchets are synonymous. I just looked, and you can prove that to yourself in The Error Coin Encyclopedia, by Margolis & Weinberg. - Mike
Blanks do not have an upraised rim. When it goes through the process of upraising the rim then it is considered a Planchet.. A Blank Planchet
I'd like to believe that, as it feels more intuitive than the definition with which I am familiar - that there is absolutely no difference between blanks and planchets.
When attributing a certain Mint Error TPG NGC will state that a Nickel was struck on a Blank.. That would be without the upraised rim. A normal strike would be on a Planchet which is what we see all the time which have upraised rims. @JCro57 will elaborate better.. It's his specialty.
Like I wrote above it is intuitive to me that, without the upset rims they be blanks, and with the upset rims they be planchets. However, as much as I'd like to agree with you and NGC, I still recognize the industry standard convention that blank planchets come in two forms . . . type 1, and type 2 . . . both still called blank planchets. As previously mentioned, this is reinforced in Margolis and Weinberg, and in common industry nomenclature referencing "blank planchets". Until the industry at large changes this convention, I'll continue to adhere to that understanding.
Here you go. Not the same. Not even close. If they were the same, why would all the Mints put them through an upsetting mill? To waste time and money? Type 1 Blank Type 2 Planchet And if I may, below is a Type 1 and Type 2 Blank (both missing rims). The first one was never burnished/polished; the second one was. Again, neither have rims. Below: a Jefferson nickel and a Mercury dime (broadstruck) on a Blank.
As I tell my students, "just because you have never heard about or didn't know it, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist."
I guess I must be missing some information, as I recognize Type 1 blank planchets as having been punched and not upset, and Type 2 blank planchets as having been both punched and upset. My understanding is that any polishing, burnishing or other treatment of the planchets would be described supplementary to the planchets being characterized as either Type 1 or Type 2. If you had a coin intended to be struck on a polished planchet, but which missed that step in the process, yet it had upset rims, would you describe it as a coin struck on a Type 1 blank / Type 2 planchet? If so, how then would you differentiate that coin from one similarly made with a planchet was not intended to be polished? I am not eager to assign descriptions based solely on what NGC chooses to put on their labels, especially when it is inconsistent with descriptions longer held by the marketplace. On the other hand, I am eager to gain an education, as long as I can invest confidence in the source. Please take no offense, but I'd like @Fred Weinberg to weigh in on this subject.
I like the ring of truth in your statement. On the flipside of the coin however, "just because you want it to be, doesn't make it so."
Blanks are a different diameter than planchets. The upset mill makes the blank a smaller diameter, which is then called a planchet. A Blank will not fit inside the collar of the press.
If you want to avoid that inelegant term there is another term for the disk punched from the strip before it is given the raised edge . . . Flan.
He did. It is spelled out very clearly in his book on the 100 Greatest U.S. Mint Errors. It is among the many sources describing such matters.