Is this a 1994 restrike of a 1992 AM? Need help

Please dont roast me this time lol but need an expert opinion on this coin. Did they restrike a '92 close AM to make it a '94

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

From 93'-2008' CAM was standard on all business strike cents I believe.

 

What would make you think that?

 

In risk of being called a jerk again, my simple answer is NO.

 

There's no reason to restrike modern zinc cents.
So you are saying the reverse of this 1994 looks like a 1992?
Let me look at the AM list:
1. 1992 Close AM - extremely rare
2. 1992-D Close AM
3. 1998 S Close AM
4. 1999 S Close AM
5. 1999 Wide AM
6. 1998 Wide AM
7. 2000 Wide AM - least rare

It doesn't look like there are any varieties on the AM for 1994.

 

No.

 

The reverse in a close AM

 

http://www.lincolncentresource.com/wideams.html

Quote - "If things went according to plan all proof cents dated 1994 and on would have the Wide AM design, and all business strikes would have the Close AM design." Closed quote

You have a normal 1994 Close AM Cent

 

Just looks like the 2 was restruck as a 4

 

They used brand new 1994 Dies in 1994.. Not old 1992 Dies

 

It doesn't look like it is just 1994. Looks like it was a small 2 the struck with a 4... But I also see 5 in cheeks too lol

 

Ok thanks.. Thought maybe restruck some of the 1992 they were test striking the 93 dies on.. Couldnt find anything on it so I bit the bullet and asked here. Thanks again

 

You're seeing things. Please don't believe the online hype in finding a rare Penny worth $$$$. I believe you are actively searching for things that don't (or can't) exist.

 

Since you know alot about coins , is there anyway you can see if any die marks on the 92 match this?

 

I didnt see this online... I was looking at coins and the 4 looked funny, so I had to ask the experts about it

 

The mint did not restrike 92' cents in 94'. All the information is in the links provided. But, that would mean you need to actually read them. HUH?

 

Well buddy, if you read any of my post, you would know, I tried to find something on it before I made this post. No need for smart ass comments

 

I have read your posts, this thread and just about all your previous.
So lets start here.
You got all the answers you needed, not to mention references by post #10. and after 9 more posts you are still trying to claim that you have something miraculous. A 94' struck with 92' dies.
I am sure that if you went and looked at all the other 94' Lincoln cents, you would see that this is the way they are. A close AM.
Nothing special!
Here is one more.
All it takes is a little reading and using your references.
http://varietyvista.com/01b LC Doubled Dies Vol 2/Memorial Reverse Design Varieties.htm

 

You got the correct answer from the start. When you ignore them, yes you will get smart ass answers.