No FG designer's initials

What is considered and no FG on the reverse of a 69 or a 1 1970 Lincoln cent I'm using a 16 x magnifier and I can barely see it what do they consider a no FG that's my question thank you

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

No means no. Not part, not most, not all but a little bit, but none. Zip, zilch, nada.

 

As stated by BooksB4Coins.
Dave

 

Thanks Dave is there a link

 

Or an example I'm just say 10 x Loop

 

I'm sure if you Google it you find something.
Dave

 

Can you post a picture of the Reverse.. I want to see if you have something besides the FG issue

 

Yes sir its brown thats why i disnt poat paddy should I start a new thread I got to 19 55s it seems to be an MS condition not a proof I don't think but really clean today for a buck at the pawn shop and it looks like it has Hub doubling where it's really thick lettering

 

I'm sorry not Hub doubling more like a distorted doubling

 

I don't know what Paddy is looking for, but there's a decent amount of the DI remaining on that one.

 

Call me ignorant but what is d i

 

I will not do that, but I will respectfully answer your question.

DI = Designer's Initials.

 

Ahh ok di got it

 

I am looking at how much of the Initials are missing. Over polished Dies will result in the faded initials... AND... causing the Floating Rooftop Variety

Kind of looks floating a bit.. that why I ask for the Reverse picture

 

That's a guy who knows his stuff thanks paddy

 

That's now considered a variety? I thought the DI thing was bad enough.

And yeah, perhaps a little, but like the DI... no cigar.

 

Its my vat of 60s and 70s 80s copper lol i dont go crazy over thinking it out of sight out of mind