Latest and Greatest eBay Gamble

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by USS656, Dec 14, 2007.

  1. gopher29

    gopher29 Coin Hoarder


    I guess it all depends on how you look at it. I just pulled out my Redbook and it appears that 1955 is the lowest mintage year and has the highest value in the lower grades. But in the higher grades the prices change drastically. 1955 only lists for $90 in PR-65 while 1950 lists for a whopping $500 in the same grade. Then there is 1949-D which lists at $850 in MS-65 but only $7 in VF-20. Prices, mintages, and values for these Franklins are all over the place.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    Those are proofs guys.
     
  4. gopher29

    gopher29 Coin Hoarder

    Wouldn't it be great if the cent in that set turned out to be a Doubled Die? :hail:
     
  5. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    :hammer: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They Are Proofs!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :hammer:

    :goofer:

    :D
     
  6. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Leadfoot:
    Actually there were proofs in 1916 and 1917, just a very limited number.
     
  7. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Yes! Proofs were minted in 1916, but what proofs were minted in 1917?
     
  8. Speedy

    Speedy Researching Coins Supporter

    You need to either ONLY look at the PROOF prices or only look at the UNC prices. In proofs the 55 isn't pricy at all....but the 1950 will run you around $400 for one graded PF66. The 1955 will run you around $100 for one graded the same.
    In UNC the 1949-S will be pricy but the most $$$ in FBL would be 1953-S.
    There really aren't any keys in this set---they are all easy to find, and get, in almost any grade.

    Speedy
     
  9. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    Cents thru half dollars, per Breen-- all were clandestinly (spelled wrong) made.
     
  10. AUBU2

    AUBU2 Senior Member

    Did they use staples on these sets at all? I keep hearing about rusted staples in coin sets, i assumed they mean the square box sets!
     
  11. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

    I don't know about the original packaging but someone used a staple on this proof set. As Doug pointed out the bags the coins are in do not look original.

    I believe I have seen them both with and without staples at coin shows.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Yes they used staples. Each coin was put in its own cellophane sleeve and then the top of all the sleeves was folded over. Then the folded tops were all stapled together to keep the coins from falling out.
     
  13. Phoenix21

    Phoenix21 Well-Known Member

    Great set man! Not that bad of a price either, if you like the set, then you did great man. :thumb: This thread turned really interesting on the sedonc page, lol.

    Phoenix :cool:
     
  14. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I stand corrected on 1916 (sry typo).

    But I'd love to see a 1917 proof. Do you have any pictures/links?
     
  15. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

    Thanks Phoenix21 - it has been interesting so far. :) Learning as we go... I hope the coins live up to all this talk - it will really be disappointing if they are all dinged up.
     
  16. AUBU2

    AUBU2 Senior Member

    I still see these sets that are mint sealed. The TV dealers keep saying some of the mint sealed sets look pretty bad.
     
  17. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

  18. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    I think the Franklin is at least a 65. Tough to say exactly from the photos, as proofs are very difficult to grade from photos in the best of cases.

    As for the rest of the coins, I would prefer they be a bit less hazy/streaky.

    But what's more important is how YOU feel about them.

    THanks for sharing...Mike
     
  19. ACW

    ACW AIM HIGH

    That nickel sure seems to have plenty of eye appeal. Nice set!!
     
  20. USS656

    USS656 Here to Learn Supporter

    That nickel is way better looking in hand than those pictures show. I'm glad you noticed! :)

    Thanks
     
  21. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    I'll try to find them, but I got the info from Breen.
    In addition, there have been 1927 Buffs that are now certified as proofs.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page