I couldn't pass up this beautiful cistophorus. Unfortunately, it was entombed in a plastic prison. To quote the eminent classicist Mary Beard - 'I was certainly turned on to antiquity by the real feel of real Roman coins in my hands.' I quite agree. Doesn't it look much better outside the plastic? Domitian AR Cistophorus, 9.99g Rome mint (for Asia), 95 AD RIC 851 (C). BMC 253. RSC 94. RPC 873 (8 spec.). Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM P M TR P XIIII IMP XXII; Head of Domitian, laureate, bearded, r. Rev: COS XVII CENS P P P; Aquila between two standards, one surmounted by a banner, the other by a hand, G in exergue Ex NFC Coins (eBay), 18 April 2018. A small issue of cistophori were struck by Domitian in 95. Style and die axis identify Rome as the home mint. Curiously, K. Butcher and M. Ponting's metal analysis reveal they were struck from a different stock of metal than contemporary denarii, possibly from recycled older denarii. The traditional military type of aquila and standards is the most commonly encountered reverse of the series. It is copied from coins struck for Nero and Galba. The 'G' in exergue may be the mark of an officina. Feel free to share your freed prisoners.
Another nice big chunk of silver not seen to often, congrats. I saved $10 postage having this Gordian III freed from it's slab before being sent to me. Roman Provincial, Moesia Inferior, Nicopolis ad Istrum, Gordian III (238-244 AD) Æ 27 (12.43g) Sabinius Modestus, legatus consularis., City Gate, Obv.: Laureate and draped bust right. Rev.: Arched gate flanked by two roofed towers with arched windows in uppermost story. Varbanov 4182. Rare! NGC XF. Green patina. The towers are actually rounded, raised off the face of the coin. Interesting details on top of the towers and along the top of the wall.
I happen to keep mine in plastic sarcophagi for reasons of personal choice, but yeah, they look great "nekkid", too. (And Mary Beard's quote is all too true- I do sacrifice that wonderful tactile aspect by keeping my ancients in slabs. It's one of the bigger downsides.) Wow. I have not owned a cistophorus yet. Awesome.
Awesome catch David, I don't recall seeing one before. Original G money, I think it represents a value of 1000 denarii.
The Alegandron Vise Squad freed this vagabond: RI Domitian AR Denarius 81-96 CE Minerva thunderbolt spear shield protruded chin COS XV CENS PPP RIC 726
Great acquisition David. Congrats. I almost bought one of these a few days ago. I like the idea of a nice large silver coin.
Those tabs are really distracting. They interrupt the visual flow of the coin and become really the dominant thing I see when I look at a slabbed ancient. For larger machine-produced modern coins they're not much of an issue. But for ancient coins they really ruin it for me.
Yes! Do you know why cisotphori would have been struck in Rome where denarii were more common? I like the details on the standards. I agree with Doug, I do not see surface issues with the coin. If anything, I would drop the strike because I suspect the missing high points on the obv. (hair, ear & wreath) were that way the day the coin was struck. But strike and surface do not address the great things about the coin like centering, art work, readable letters....
The modern part of me says no, but the "ancient" part of me says definitely yes!!! (I put ancient in quotes because, well, you know....) (I will hint that I did acquire a piece which is currently being "processed", & if it turns out favorably I will post it, so at least @TIF will be happy.) Also, isn't it incredible what the escape did for @Julius Germanicus in post #7?
In hand there are no surface issues that would warrant a 3. I even revisited NGC's guidelines and see no reason why this coin received such a low mark by them. https://www.ngccoin.com/specialty-services/ancient-coins/grading.aspx
Your slab cracking method is, shall we say, less messy than mine! I just use a hammer and flathead screw driver on a hard surface. A very primal way of doing it!
Ah, that is the million cistophori question! My guess would be that it has something to do with the continued centralisation of the production of imperial silver that began in Vespasian's reign. One by one, the imperial provincial mints were closed down. By the time Titus was emperor Rome was the only mint producing imperial silver coins. Even Cappadocian silver was partly produced in Rome under Vespasian and exclusively so under Domitian.