LMC 1970-S DD0-001?

Absolutely! Yes. I spent almost 30 years in the photography business, fool. You don't get to confuse ME with your gibberish definitions.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

pictures, images, photograph...the importance is that you realized they are not the same. You will get to know the exact definitions learning each of their characteristics, which will allow you to make the differences between a photograph and an image. It comes really handy, especially when you buy something on the internet.

 

Very good. Then why are you in contradiction with me, instead of providing your support when I claim the 1970-S images which were sent in comparison to my photograph are insufficient? We can't prove anything with a drawing.

 

Use "drawing" and "photograph" and stop with "image" and "picture". You have ZERO idea what you're talking about.

 

Because they are NOT drawings; they are photographs. Note their histograms are SMOOTH, not several peaked like the Pik-a-chu drawing is.

 

Let me check again: Are these photographs or drawings according to you?

 

I'm sorry, Kurt, but the more you try to reason with this one, the dumber you will become. Trust me, I know. He's parasitic.

 

All 3 are PHOTOGRAPHS, or cropped portions thereof, to be more precise.

 

I feel like I'm trying to explain something to the hillbilly voice-over guy from the "Freedom Checks" radio ad scam.

 

I think what's confusing ol' Waggers here is the difference between POORLY done and PROFESSIONALLY done coin photographs.

 

You mean it's a " collage " using a photo-editor software?

 

Sure, it's to put all the relevant portions of the photograph into close physical proximity to one another. The in-between stuff is useless for the purpose.

 

Wether poorly or professionally made, the image of pick-a-chu is not a photo.

 

No, of course not, but that wouldn't prevent me from taking a photograph of that drawing, now would it? And I have at least two ways to do that. 1) whip out a camera, and photograph my screen, and 2) have my software do a screen grab and then crop out any excess.

 

at least we agree now that an image is not a photograph. A picture ID is not an image, so I would consider image be different from either a photo or a pic.

 

conclusion: an image is not a picture.

 

Wrong conclusion. All images are pictures and all pictures are images. To be precise, Pik-a-chu is a vector-based drawing. Photographs are bitmaps.

 

Are you sure the D above shows machine doubling? Below, is the W showing MD?

 

True hub doubling does not "pick and choose" where to, and where not to, show up. It's either all there, all the way, or it's not the real thing. No a la carte.

True hub doubling is "holistic". All there, all the way.