State Quarters for US Territories?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Myron, Dec 10, 2007.

  1. Myron

    Myron Senior Member

    I think that my local coin dealer must be dreaming. He claims that after the US Mint produces the 50 State Quarters in 2008, they will mint quarters for Puerto Rico, Guam, and other US territories as part of the State Quarters Collection. I never heard of this. Is this just a rumor or is there truth behind it?
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    It's been proposed, but last I heard nothing active is being done about it.
    Since I think Congress has to approve something like this, don't hold your breath.
     
  4. Indianhead65

    Indianhead65 Well-Known Member

  5. elaine 1970

    elaine 1970 material girl

    end of statehood series

    forget about that......
     
  6. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    I have to say as a non American collector of the State coins that I would welcome the extension.
    I think that the coins have given not only Americans but collectors world wide a better understanding of the USA as an entity and this would increase that knowladge. :thumb:
     
  7. Daggarjon

    Daggarjon Supporter**

    I agree with De Orc, while i dont particualry like the program, it has helped the hobby in alot of different ways. I dont like the 'token' like coins, but would like to see what they come up with for the non-states. being that they are for the most part un-known by most as compared to actual states, i think they have alot of room to come up with some very interesting designs.
     
  8. d_lairson

    d_lairson Looking for loose change

    I hate to say it folks, but DC and the other territories are part of the US... You would have a hard time convincing me that at least DC and Puerto Rico don't deserve quarters. As for the rest, well they round out the number to 5.

    I also have selfish reasons for wanting a state quarter extension. Imagine the 2009 proof set with them... at least 4 different cents, a nickel, a dime, 5 quarters, a Kennedy, 4 pres dollars and a sac. It would have to be 4 lenses. That would rock!

    Cheers,
    David
     
  9. vipergts2

    vipergts2 Jester in hobby of kings

    I just sold a roll of prez dollars to a guy in Puerto Rico, so theere must be at least a few US coin collectors there also. I think it would be good to go one more year. Myself, I wouldn't mind getting some DC and territories quarters.
     
  10. Phoenix21

    Phoenix21 Well-Known Member

    Man, that would. And expensive. :D Be neat if they did do the surrounding territories, but like said, I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you. But, never know. Congress might surprise us. :)

    Phoenix :cool:
     
  11. andrew289

    andrew289 Senior Analyst

    A hard time convincing? I don't think so.
    Just answer a couple simple questions.
    Answers provided.

    What is the name of the State Quarters Program?
    The State Quarter Program

    What do the stars on the US flag represent?
    One star for each state

    How many stars are there on the US flag?
    50

    When did puerto Rico become a state?
    It's not a state.

    When did Washington, DC become a state?
    It's not a state

    When did the other territories become states?
    They aren't states

    What is the name of the State Quarter Program?
    The state quarter program

    Convinced yet? Deserving has nothing to do with it. There is no gray area.
    DC, PR and the other territories DON"T QUALIFY.
    They are NOT States.

    Simple as that.

    Last I checked it's not the "Part of the US Quarter Program."
     
  12. SCNuss

    SCNuss Senior Member

    "Deserving has nothing to do with it. There is no gray area.
    DC, PR and the other territories DON"T QUALIFY.
    They are NOT States.

    Simple as that."

    Except that when Congress is involved, NOTHING is as "simple as that". :eek:
     
  13. andrew289

    andrew289 Senior Analyst


    LOL...very true.
    It might just happen but I hope not.
    Never under estimate the power of lobby.
     
  14. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator


    Yeah they might, but they have already said no like 6 times.
     
  15. Phoenix21

    Phoenix21 Well-Known Member

    Okay, I didn't know that. Then I guess that kind of answers the original question then. :D

    Phoenix :cool:
     
  16. De Orc

    De Orc Well-Known Member

    What Doug say's is very true they have said NO 6 times in the past but I ask you to look at what is happening at the moment, your coinage has undergone quite some changes over the past few years with new issues :eek: and the same is happening to you notes they are a changing :smile (Terrible colour is been added)
    Just look at how long it has taken you to get edge lettering on your coins while the rest of the world has done it since the 1800s LOL So honestly I woudnt count the idea out LOL
     
  17. Dockwalliper

    Dockwalliper Coin Hoarder

    H.R. 392: District of Columbia and United States Territories Circulating Quarter Dollar Program Act was passed by the house on January 23rd 2007 and sent to the Senate for a vote. On Jan 24, 2007: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs where it sits today.
    This is the 5th time the law was passed by congress but each time the senate fails to act and the bill dies.(2001,'02,'05,'06,'07) A recent article in Neumismatic News speculated that Senate might act this year because the time is running short to have designs ready. Maybe part of an omnibus coin bill like the one that gave us president dollars, Buffalo Gold and 2009 commemerative cents.


    The bill passed by congress this year is NOT an extencion of the state quarter program. Its called the District of Columbia and United States Territories Circulating Quarter Dollar Program Act It just happens tofollow the State quarter program.

    Congress has NEVER said no to the quarter program. It has passed every time it came up and sent to the Senate.
    The Senate has never voted on any of the bills. They never came up for a vote.

    Personally I think theres a decent chance this will come up to a vote in the senate soon and will pass. Gotta figure an extra half Million in seigniorage.............
     
  18. hontonai

    hontonai Registered Contrarian

    Back during WW II, when I took high school civics, "Congress" consisted of the "House of Representatives" and the "Senate".

    Guess I missed it when the Senate became a separate branch of government, with the House transmuting into the entire Congress.
     
  19. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    The problem comes from the fact that Senators are almost always referred to as "Senator", and the Candidates for the office are always running for "The Senate". Members of the House have the proper title of Representative XXX but are more commonly referred to as "Congressman" and the candidates for office are almost always running "For Congress". It tends to confuse people and they begin referring to the houses as "Congress" and "The Senate" rather than by their proper names and using Congress to mean the collective whole.
     
  20. bama guy

    bama guy Coin Hoarder

    Our tax dollar at work
     
  21. Pocket Change

    Pocket Change Coin Collector

    As an American who has spent more than half of my life overseas, I think it would be kind of cool to do quarters for the territories, etc. What the Hey! It's just another year and a few more quarters. I've never been to Puerto Rico or Guam, but I'm guessing they'd love to see those quarters.

    And I also know, that many think this quarter program is old and should be killed off as soon as possible.

    So toss a coin!!! :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page