1972 Philadelphia DDO?

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by McCann, Feb 24, 2018.

  1. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    And the deflection continues. Just because you may not like being called out, this doesn't make me a troll. However, since you've nothing else to stand on, you might as well grasp at whatever straws available to you.

    Oh, and you are = you're, not your.

    I'll tell you what, Rick. If the mods have no problem with the copy/paste jobs while refusing to cite your source, that's good enough for me. Still, and regardless of if they're okay with it, this doesn't change the fact it's beyond pitiful that you refuse to give the man credit for his work.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. McCann

    McCann Active Member

    Thanks Rick, for taking the time to research the type of ddo this 1972 Philadelphia is.In the past you gave me information on my 2015 Philadelphia and you do mention John Wexlers list.So the statement in the above post is false.I still haven't done anything with the 2015 cent yet."Finally"I find a nice ddo and it turns out to be common.Ill have to see which 1972s are worth money.I just acquired alot of them.Well back to searching.Do you want to see a picture of the entire obverse and reverse?If so Ill take the time snap some pictures.Not today tomorrow or the next,
    Thanks,
    McCann
     
    Rick Stachowski likes this.
  4. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Yes, the site does respect authors and expect citations each time if it falls under copyright. It is not the same for posting an URL to the information rather than the text or author created illustrations, photos, drawings , etc., and I guess as we have been notified by an individual ~ author created fonts. I will be sure to remove any in the future that are reported. Jim
     
  5. 352sdeer

    352sdeer Collecting Lincoln cents for 50 years!

    Not sure which one is Rick or which one is Books. Lol.
    9478B187-C330-454C-A0A6-24A92C877B50.gif
    Reed and a rolling on the floor Sparkles the Unicorn.
     
    juris klavins likes this.
  6. McCann

    McCann Active Member

    Hi Rick,I want to put this 1972 in a flip.
    Should I label it WMDO-001?Keep on the lookout for my next one.
    Thanks
    McCann
     
  7. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    A quote from the previously quoted website....

    "Since the majority of 1972 cents show this doubling, you should easily find one for the cost of a “regular” 1972 Lincoln cent."

    I've seen master doubling estimates as high as 60%-70% of the total 1972 cent mintage, meaning that your coin is likely more common than examples that do not display it. The coin could make for a fine example specimen if you'd like one, but in a general sense is no more worthy of a flip than any other circulated cent taken from change.
     
    352sdeer and McCann like this.
  8. McCann

    McCann Active Member

    Thanks for the information.That's a shame,nice doubling.But common.Maybe it will be worth something in 50 years or so when cash money is obsolete.Still going in a flip.
    Thanks
    McCann
     
  9. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    So that people do not think that the W in WMDO means Wide, perhaps WxDO should be used.

    Also since 70% has it, it might be better to discard it and save one that doesn't have it. Perhaps a CTNO-1 meaning a normal cent.
     
    McCann likes this.
  10. McCann

    McCann Active Member

    That's a good idea.Find a no error 1972 in good MS condition.
    McCann
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page