What's the proper terminology...

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by JayF, Feb 20, 2018.

  1. JayF

    JayF Active Member

    or is there? I have these 60s "shiny" coins which I know are not proof (not squared rim) but they do have a different smooth shiny surfaces. I don't think it's AU or BU either because they show wear on the field area. I've found some 70s and 80s pennies in the same state, just wondering if there's a specific terminology for such coins. IMG_5248 2.jpg IMG_5249 2.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. TONYBRONX

    TONYBRONX Well-Known Member

    Shinny circulated pennys!
     
    JayF likes this.
  4. JayF

    JayF Active Member

    Hehe, i'll take that... thanks!
     
  5. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    proper terminology?

    change
     
    JayF likes this.
  6. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    "Mint state red".
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  7. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Proper term would be cent, worth $.01.
     
    JayF likes this.
  8. JayF

    JayF Active Member

    I think I will personally start calling them pretty pennies. I actually prefer finding these over the DDOs and the DDRs (unless it's the 55 and 69 lol.) Thanks!
     
    abuckmaster147 likes this.
  9. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    The old term for a coin that had much of the mint state characteristic but had minute signs of circulation was "slider" as it could slide under the line. Before that it was called "cabinet rub" as many coins were collected mainly in wooden cabinets lines with felt or similar material.
     
    JayF likes this.
  10. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    In today's world they are usually called Almost Uncirculated (AU) or Extremely Fine (XF or EF). Depending of course on just how much wear there is.
     
    JayF likes this.
  11. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    In today’s world, I highly doubt any of those three are anywhere lower than MS62.
     
  12. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

    Won't even try to argue that Kurt. But it does depend upon whom you ask. As the man said, and he owns the coins, they do have wear on them. And by definition that means they are not MS. Even in today's world ;)
     
    JayF likes this.
  13. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    Yeah, hard to see it with where the glare is. From an aesthetic viewpoint, the mottled color on the 1964 is nice. Too bad it won’t stay that way.
     
  14. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    Just got my judging assignments for the Dallas ANA. For the first time, I’m on the “Best in Show” panel, as well as the largest class.
     
    tommyc03 and dwhiz like this.
  15. abuckmaster147

    abuckmaster147 Well-Known Member

    Dang Kurt I thought you were lost but Nope just changed avatar:D:rolleyes: on me.
     
  16. abuckmaster147

    abuckmaster147 Well-Known Member

    Oh Boy Cent for your thoughts? Nope still penny.:D:p:p
     
    JayF likes this.
  17. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    And The Farce is strong in me, too.
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  18. TheFinn

    TheFinn Well-Known Member

    AU-Unc.
     
    JayF likes this.
  19. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    It was originally a British saying, so there’s that.
     
  20. JayF

    JayF Active Member

    Cool, that's really good to know. I've never heard of those terminologies before. Appreciate the info! Thanks for the reply.
     
  21. JayF

    JayF Active Member

    Just found this beauty tonight...big ding on Lincoln's cheek and a nasty green wig but love how it looks really new.

    IMG_5405.jpg IMG_5404.jpg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page