I am going to let this 1877 IHC go - it will probably go to an acquaintance who would like to have one. Not being a small cent collector would like to ask you to value it to have a ball park figure to go by. Thanks!
I personally see it as a G6 to borderline VG8. Some minor surface issues, but I think it has a reasonably decent chance at a straight-grade if submitted to a TPG. It's really not too bad for a circulated example in this grade range. Numismedia has the 1877 IHC at $450 in G4 and $576 in VG8. Retail estimate? $500 or so, I'd guess. You of course would be unlikely to get such an offer from a dealer, but this is a nice coin to have if genuine, and I see no obvious red flags on that front. The weakness on the lower portion of the N in ONE is a good sign.
PS- in PCGS plastic with a straight grade, it would list for $550 in G4, $650 in G6, and $800 in VG8, so this is definitely one of those coins that would be well worth submitting for grading.
Great, thank you very much, lordmarcovan Thanks for the ballpark value. I'm no good grading these - I would have gone lower.
Full rims there, and just a little bit of headband with the L in Liberty showing. That's solid G4 territory, and arguably G6. A lot of the G4 examples I've seen have a totally flat portrait with no detail.
Per PCGS Photograde: Here is G4. Here is G6. Here is VG8. So G6 is, by comparison with these examples, actually pretty reasonable for your coin there. It's maybe got a shot at VG8, though I personally like to see a litte bit more traces of LIBERTY on the headband for that grade.
I'm with @C-B-D - I think it's solid upper G and in today's world that's a TPG VG especially on these.
I think the reverse is VG, net G. Obverse is technical G-, the top right rim is too weak for a full G, but the TPG'ers may let it pass since it is a key date
Thanks all for your comments, and lordmarcovan - many thanks again for the pictorial guide! Time to let this coin go.
Does date matter on the pricing you just quoted ? I have an 1899 very similar to his. I'd post the pics here but didn't want to hijack this gentleman's post. Thanks!
It matters a LOT in this case. The 1877 is the key date for the series, while 1899 is a common date. Here's the Numismedia trend prices for the whole series, so you can compare them.
@lordmarcovan Never mind, went to the link you posted (numismatic) and checked 1899. Thanks for the link!
Glad to help. You see, the 1877 @Eduard posted is the "king" of the series. (The 1909-S is arguably the second-best to have.)
Yeah, I was checking the details on the coin and totally forgot the "key" dates...still have to learn all of them (transitional years, etc) Enjoying learning a lot just by reading people's posts.
I don't agree with this practice by the TPGs (all coins of the same type should be graded to the same standard, regardless of whether they're common or key dates), but yes, I do agree that a little bit of "gradeflation" or "market grading" does seem to happen on key date coins.
Like others have said it's a solid VG. The date is sharp and overall it isn't a bad looking key date coin. It's easily a $500-700 coin.
I’m at g-6. Especially with the minor surface issues. I’d give it a soak in verdicare and try and see if it’ll go away too. I think wholesale around $425 and retail around $500 for it