10C - Partial Clad Layer on Obverse - 1.8g - 1988 D

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by paddyman98, Dec 21, 2017.

  1. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Hi all,
    I just wanted to share my 1st of 3 new Mint Errors I acquired recently

    10C - Partial Clad Layer on Obverse
    1988 D - 1.8G
    Enjoy :woot:
    001.jpg 002.jpg 003.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. 352sdeer

    352sdeer Collecting Lincoln cents for 50 years!

    That’s a mushy striking for sure but it really goes well with the clad error. Nice.
     
    Last edited: Dec 21, 2017
    paddyman98 likes this.
  4. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    The mushy strike could be related to the missing clad layer. not enough metal to fill in the recess's.
     
    Oldhoopster and paddyman98 like this.
  5. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    If that were the case, wouldn't part of "UNITED STATES" be better struck since the clad layer on the obverse is not missing in that area?

    Chris
     
  6. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    In theory, that would seem correct!
     
  7. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    How does a "partial" like this happen, and on just one side?
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  8. Youngcoin

    Youngcoin Everything Collector

    Wow really cool!

    Thanks,
    Jacob
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  9. Oldhoopster

    Oldhoopster Member of the ANA since 1982

    A defect in the strip that wasn't caught when it was rolled to thickness.

    When the 3 layers are go through the cladding process, it's not hard to imagine uneven edges, or even a defect within one of the layers. What's unusual is that it wasn't trimmed away or caught in the inspection process prior to blanking.

    I also suppose it could be like a lamination where areas within the 3 layers did not properly bond, then separated after the blanking process, subsequently breaking off prior to striking (I don't think this is case for paddyman's example, however)
     
    352sdeer and paddyman98 like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page