1909 Proof LWC???

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by mrjason71, Dec 12, 2017.

  1. mrjason71

    mrjason71 Active Member

    I know this is a longshot but thought Id put it out there and get a more definitive opinion. Ive had this coin a long time. I just learned that there were matte proofs made the first handful of years of the series. This cent has always looked peculiar to me and I was looking at it the other day and I thought maybe this is whats weird about it. There's probably someone every other day thinking they have one so forgive me. I read up on the diagnostics a little. I believe there are two die varieties. The first has a diagnostic (die scratch?) running down along the nose and the second has a "claw" shaped diagnostic in the field to the right of Lincoln. The site I was on no longer had the pics available so I dont know exactly what the claw looks like. This cent definitely has something that could be considered claw-like in the field...

    I have to remove it from its holder and get a better look at the rims but looking through the holder, they seem to be pretty pronounced. Finally, sorry about the pics. Hope they are good enough to make a call. One thing I could not capture is how satin-y it looks. Could just be a ton of scratches but the legends and Lincoln (is he a legend or what?) have nowhere near the frequency of "dings". The legends being higher than the fields, you would think they would be equally or more greatly "nicked up".

    Thanks in advance for any thoughts and please let me down gently ;)
     

    Attached Files:

    SchwaVB57 likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    waste the 2 cents and take it out of the holder to take pictures
     
  4. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Sorry but no. Not a proof. Compare the rims.
    26.jpg
     
  5. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    Agreed, a lovely example, but not a proof strike.
     
  6. mrjason71

    mrjason71 Active Member

    Thanks for taking a look guys...I know there's a bit of wishful thinking clouding my senses ;)

    I wonder if it's just all nicked up? Or did some matte'd planchets get thrown into the circulation strike bin? It's just the oddest coin. I'll get better pics outside of holder and try to capture the satin-y-ness of it...Great learning experience; been learning a lot about early LWC proofs. Seems the second die variety is/was a bit contested. Fun stuff ;)
     
  7. wxcoin

    wxcoin Getting no respect since I was a baby

    I agree. I have a 1909 proof and your coin definitely is not one. That said, it's still a nice business strike.
     
    mrjason71 likes this.
  8. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    Really? We almost NEVER see that on CoinTalk. :hilarious::hilarious::hilarious::hilarious:
     
    Treashunt, green18 and Kentucky like this.
  9. mrjason71

    mrjason71 Active Member

    Yeah it's tough..."hmmm well these rims do look kinda square...especially when I turn it just so in the light..."

    Who am I kidding: I'm still holding out hope damn it !
     
    Kentucky and wxcoin like this.
  10. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I'll have to let you down, too. It's a freaking beauty, though! Gentle enough? :)
     
    green18 likes this.
  11. mrjason71

    mrjason71 Active Member

    Yes, that was nice. Can still feel a little good about my coin ;)

    Thank you :)
     
    Kentucky likes this.
  12. Kentucky

    Kentucky Supporter! Supporter

    Anytime you get tired of it, I would love to adopt it...
     
    green18 and mrjason71 like this.
  13. desertgem

    desertgem Senior Errer Collecktor Supporter

    Hey, you accepted it on the first page, usually it takes at least 20+ pages before the opinions on LMPs are accepted.
     
    Kentucky, BadThad and Kirkuleez like this.
  14. robec

    robec Junior Member

    What does LWC mean? I've never seen MPL's referred to by that before.
     
  15. Kirkuleez

    Kirkuleez 80 proof

    Lotto winning cent? I was thinking the same thing.
     
  16. robec

    robec Junior Member

    Here are the Die 1 die scratches in front of the nose.

    [​IMG]

    These are die scratches from Die 2. I don't think they are suppose to look like a bear claw, but more like scratches from bear claw.

    [​IMG] [​IMG]
     
  17. mrjason71

    mrjason71 Active Member

    That's where the claw is on mine!!!
     
  18. mrjason71

    mrjason71 Active Member

    I don't understand. Did I mess up? Is it not a wheat cent if it's a bit proof or something?
     
  19. mrjason71

    mrjason71 Active Member

    I'm back!
     
  20. robec

    robec Junior Member

    Oh, I get it. You're right it is a Lincoln Wheat Proof. They have always been called Matte Proof Lincoln's (MPL's) since before there were any other kind of Lincoln. It just threw me.

    If your scratches are exactly like those in the photos I posted you should think about having it authenticated. The scratches need to be identical, not just in the same area. All the lines have to match.
     
    green18 likes this.
  21. BadThad

    BadThad Calibrated for Lincolns

    1909 was the first year for Lincolns so the hubs and dies were in excellent condition. Some of us believe in the possibility that the used proof dies were released for use in normal coin production, either that or the mint was experimenting with sand-blasting the working dies. It's not too uncommon to find 1909's and 1910's with matte-like fields and pretty square rims. We get many posts every year and I can only recall a couple that where actually MPL's.

    Here's the reverse of one of my 1909's, you can see the frosty matte-like fields:


    1909lincoln2016rev2.jpg
     
    ldhair likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page