Financial Discussion

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by Mike Drop, Dec 8, 2017.

  1. Mike Drop

    Mike Drop Active Member

    Should the government order the backing of all US currency through gold and silver? Is it possible to reenact that policy? Let me know what you think!
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Nope.

    And, nope.
     
  4. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    No. No. No. Not ever. Never should have been in the first place. Caused horrible human suffering. Next place that does it needs to be obliterated.
     
  5. Santinidollar

    Santinidollar Supporter! Supporter

    No. No. And there’s not one good reason anyone can cite for doing so, other than nonsensical arguments put forth by gold bugs.
     
  6. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    The story is told of the
    Power of gold
    And its lure on the unsuspecting
    It glitters and shines
    It badgers and blinds
    And constantly needs protecting.

    Balance the cost of the soul you lost
    With the dreams you lightly sold
    Are you under
    The power of gold?
     
  7. Conder101

    Conder101 Numismatist

    Should it be done No,

    Could it be done? Physical currency, yes it could be done, but only after a revaluation of the currency at a 100:1 ratio. (All the electronic currency would have to be similarly revalued as well.) Even then the best thing would be to apply a fractional backing.

    Is it worth doing? No.
     
  8. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    No and No. There is no reason too
     
    Santinidollar likes this.
  9. cwart

    cwart Senior Member

    Dan Fogelberg.... nice
     
  10. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    The best reason to use a hard currency is that physical currency limits inflation.

    The best reason not to use a hard currency is that physical currency limits inflation.

    Depends on your perspective of what is more important from a macro-economic, political, and ideological standpoint.
     
  11. rmpsrpms

    rmpsrpms Lincoln Maniac

    It's already in place, below the surface of the fiat monetary systems. Always has been. Gold is moved around based on the growth and power of the countries in possession of it. So like it or not the world is on an a uber-macro (or perhaps unter-macro) gold standard. It's always been this way, it's just slightly obfuscated at the moment.
     
  12. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    Ummm, no. Not even close.
     
    baseball21 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page