Noo that’s not what I’m asking. I’m asking if it is an rpm,IMM, or both. Because I feel like he keeps contradicting himself. He first told me he thought it was the imm and now he is looking at all the RPMs and I didn’t even think this was an rpm lol
Here's the 2 mint-mark styles for 1946 . Easy to see yours is MMS-006 . Now look how wide your coin is . Again, it's a RPM ..
Wow, that's pretty hard to see. Rick, I think the 1 is upside-down. Do you know if Wexler knows about these upside-down 1s, or are they new discoveries?
Hey life to short to worry about one common coin so much. It’s an error, a minor error. Find more and you’ll have more examples to match up. I find it easy to get hung up on one coin and get “ lost” in the microscope for hours. So I just don’t use it much. If I can’t see it with a loupe I don’t want it! The hours spent hand wringing about this coin could better be spent roll hunting. A bet you’d have found a error or two in the time.
A coin with even a bit of wear can be troublesome to identify. First eliminate the MM that aren't sans serif, then elimate those that have the incorrect MM positioning. Third find a characteristic on your MM to match it to. They can be difficult until you have done this many, many times. Good luck!