1972 1¢ WMDO-001 Doubled Master Die Description: An extremely close Class I CW spread shows on the letters of LIBERTY, IGWT, and the horizontal bar of the 2 in the date. On early die state specimens the E of WE appears to show tripling suggesting a CCW spread in addition to the CW spread. Die Markers: Obverse: The affected master die shows a short die gouge extending eastward inside the upper S of TRUST. Other obverse die markers will vary with the different working dies that were affected. Reverse: Die markers will vary with the different working dies that were affected. Submitted By: John A. Wexler Cross References: CONECA: MD-1-O-I-CW+II-C (formerly listed as MD-5-O-I-CW+II-C), Crawford: CDDO-005 (MD) Values: No extra value!!! Comments: Shortly after the various obverse doubled die cent varieties were produced that year, the Lincoln cent master die for 1972 failed and a new one had to be produced. Clearly the Mint was having problems that year with the hubbing process as was evidenced by the many doubled die varieties produced. Those problems carried over to the second master die that was produced for the Lincoln cents that year. That second master die was produced with minor doubling. It is estimated that the doubled master die was created somewhere around April or May of 1972. All of the Lincoln cents struck by working dies that descended from the doubled master die show this minor doubling. The doubling can be seen on the letters of IGWT, the letters of LIBERTY, and very slightly on the date. Since 60% to 70% of all Lincoln cents for 1972 show this doubling, it is far too common to have any value. This includes 1972 D-Mint, S-Mint, and proof coins produced that year. Newer doubled die collectors should be very careful if responding to ads for 1972 doubled die Lincoln cents. There are individuals out there trying to sell specimens of this doubled master die for premiums far in excess of what they should be. You should not be paying more than the normal numismatic value of a 1972 cent for 1972 cents with this master die doubling. Those trying to sell them to unsuspecting buyers advertise them as “genuine doubled dies” which they are. The ads are truthful in that respect, but they fail to tell you that it is a specimen of the doubled master die that can easily be found without paying a premium for it. Back when they were first listed they were assigned a listing number of 1972 1¢ MD-5-O-I+II. Those trying to sell them at a premium identify them as “5-O-I+II” but they leave off the master die indicator “MD.” If you are fairly new to doubled die collecting, don’t let yourself fall victim to these scams. If you would like to add a specimen of the doubled master die to your collection for educational purposes, go out and look for them yourself. Since the majority of 1972 cents show this doubling, you should easily find one for the cost of a “regular” 1972 Lincoln cent.
Yes, the coin displays said master doubling, but this is NOT what's responsible for the date. Try strike doubling.
First and foremost, Always understand the stage or state of a die ( MDO - stage G ) Lol . The date is caused from what post #2 states .. I'm off to the coin show ..........
I think this is an example of where you have both true doubling (albeit Master Doubling) and Strike Doubling. Whatever the case, it sure is nifty looking, but alas probably not worth more than 1 cent (or 2 cents as Copper), given its overall condition. Semper Fidelis
Very cool. I'd keep it just because of the look. Agree with the others that it isn't worth anything over FV.
"Lol"... seriously? Instead of trying to save face where none was lost, perhaps try making your case by explaining exactly how this could be. Even if kudos are deserved for your efforts and the times correct, you've also mislead more people than any ten members of this board combined.
This is indeed "the" big one for the date/mint, at least spread-wise, and gorgeous coin to boot. However, for the sake of posterity and/or discussion, it's also one of numerous.... http://doubleddie.com/384301.html
I agree, it's not as rare as a 1955 DDO, but it still is a coin well worth having in your collection. As some of you may remember, I sent in a 1955 and a 1972 to NGC, the 1955 came back not genuine.
I have a few of the 72s, Bought these 2 from Bower and Merena in the 80s for $225 each, and the bottom one later in 2005 for about twice that. The toning is about the same as in the photo, much better looking in hand or probably if I had better lighting
