Beautiful representation Ray. I guess Constantine had himself baptized on his death bed to cover all his bases, so to speak.
There were two things about that coin that I thought were unusual and interesting: the little casting sprue, and the fact the weak strike on the reverse makes Constantine look like he's fading out, like a ghost.
CONS in exe is Constantinople rather than Antioch. I have these from Alexandria Constantine the Great (posthumous) - AE4 Obv:- DV CONSTANTINVS PT AVGG, veiled bust right Rev:- Emperor, veiled, in quadriga right, the hand of God reaches down to him Minted in Alexandria (//SMALA) 337 - April 340 A.D. Reference RIC VIII Alexandria 12 Constantine the Great (posthumous) - AE4 Obv: DV CONSTANTINVS PT AVGG, veiled bust right Rev: VN | MR, Emperor veiled standing right Minted in Alexandria (//SMALD) 337 - April 340 A.D Reference:– RIC VIII Alexandria 32
Tremendous presentation as usual DR Constantine the Great, Follis No mint mark, attributed to Treveri CONSTANTINVS PF AVG, laureate and cuirassed bust right SOLI INVICTO COMITI, radiate and draped bust of Sol right 3.63 gr Ref : Cohen # 514, Roman coins IV # 3867 Constantine the Great, Posthumous AE3 Nicomedia mint, 2nd officina D V CONSTANTINVS PT AVGG, veiled bust right Anepigraph, Constantine the great in a Quadriga right, SMNS at exergue 2.19 gr Ref : Cohen # 760, LRBC # 1132 Q
When shopping for these consider if you agree with me that clear obverse legends are worth a premium. Constantine died a Christian but still was labeled DV for Divus. The other end of the legend reads PT AVGG or Pater Augustorum (father of the Emperors) which is a unique usage worth seeking out IMHO. The small flans and tiny letters make many hard to read. This is Antioch. SMANZ
Mine has wear, just the way I like them And the way the light played on the reverse gives the fire look, kinda
That was the work of his sons, who were not Christians. We don't know much about what being a Christian meant to Constantine. Would he have approved of being deified, or would he have acquired enough humility to reject the idea? Roman emperors never seemed endowed with copious amounts of humility.
Very nice! I'll go ahead and pile on... Imperial Rome Constantine I Posthumous, (337-348) Antioch Mint, Billon Reduced Centenionalis, 16mm x 1.2 grams Obv.: DV CONSTANTI-NVS PT AVGG, veiled, draped and cuirassed bust right Rev.: No legend, Divus Constantine in quadriga right, star above, the hand of God reaching down to him. Mintmark: SMANΔ Ref.: SRCV 17488
I'm going to need convincing on this one. The sons were raised by high level tutors who were Christian which s what caused some of the problems. Constantius II was raised Arian (or a mid-position tolerating the Arians) while Constans was Orthodox. They nearly came to blows over the question. I always took note of the edict Constantius issued forbidding non Christians from buying Christian slave prostitutes. Slavery was OK; prostitution was OK; you just could not force a woman into the service of a pagan under such circumstances.