1960 d S/L date

Thank you One more this one is red as it gets mint sd over lg date i think all the signs are there

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

small date.

 

Yessssss awesome bro so happy thank you sooooo much coin is prob ms 66 or 67

 

I doubt it's a 66-67. Which are very high grade.
I don't see the whole coin 63 is possible. Not really worth much.
A 1960 small date Philly in MS 65 would be very nice.
My over priced high retail online guide has it at 20 cents in MS and 30 cents in MS 65. Which means even if it is worth a dime, there's no market for it.
Are you going to pay to have it graded?

 

66-67? For that year strike and outstanding luster is needed.
I see neither.

 

I see the coin in the other thread. I think 60-63 is likely.
While it may be a keeper, the value is very low.

 

By far the tougher small date is the Philly 1960. On D's, the small date is the more common coin.

 

For a true sm/lg date DDO for this year, the zero is the more telling as in this small over large date.
You can see the smaller zero (red line) centered over the large zero ( blue line). It is also a D/D Wide RPM.

 

Wow thank

 

The small over large (or vice versa) ALSO exists as a 1960 proof, if I recall correctly.

 

Maybe a new varity is the one i have

 

Looks like rpm to the top ne of the d

 

@V. Kurt Bellman I believe both fs 501 and fs 502 are proof small date over large date.

 

Is the proof s mint mark

 

There ya go draggin out all that slick exotic FS nomenclature again.

 

No, 1968 marked the beginning of S proofs (a really basic piece of knowledge EVERYONE should know). Prior to the 1965-1967 hiatus, all proofs were plain, without mintmark, and struck in Philly. I was once struck in Philly, but that's another story for another occasion.

 

Fivas/Stanton

 

I know, just having a little fun.

 

Yours is a sm dt Lincoln cent. Not an RPM, or doubled die.

 

Ok i got some 1960 no mint mark now i have to look again F ___