Thessaly photos - Which to keep?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Topcat7, Jun 20, 2017.

  1. Topcat7

    Topcat7 Still Learning

    These are photos of the same Thessaly coin using different lighting.
    One obscures the 'patina' while the other highlights it.
    I do not know which photo to 'file'.
    I am looking for some 'consensus'.
    Which should I keep?

    View attachment 640579 View attachment 640580
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    The first
     
  4. David Atherton

    David Atherton Flavian Fanatic

    I'm with Bing, #1 looks more natural.
     
  5. TJC

    TJC Well-Known Member

    The first is by far better. Nice pic!
     
  6. Severus Alexander

    Severus Alexander find me at NumisForums

    Dissenter here... I say show off the iridescent toning!
     
    Andres2 and Alegandron like this.
  7. Roman Collector

    Roman Collector Well-Known Member

    The bottom is best. It looks more three dimensional and has nice toning.
     
    Alegandron likes this.
  8. Ancient Aussie

    Ancient Aussie Well-Known Member

    The bottom one seems to show more detail due to the increased lighting.
     
    Alegandron likes this.
  9. brandon spiegel

    brandon spiegel Brandon Spiegel

    Personally, I would go into publisher and group the two images togther then save it as an image, so you can show off more charismatics of the coin.
     
  10. Topcat7

    Topcat7 Still Learning

    Three and three. What to do?
     
    Severus Alexander likes this.
  11. brandon spiegel

    brandon spiegel Brandon Spiegel

    Overall I personally like the bottom image the best though
     
  12. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Coin Talk - Error
    The requested attachment could not be found.

    Coin Talk - Error
    The requested attachment could not be found.
     
    Tyler Graton and TIF like this.
  13. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    When the image links are clicked I see only the error messages posted by LM.
     
  14. ancientcoinguru

    ancientcoinguru Well-Known Member

    I also only see the error messages
     
  15. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I think this was some kind of test.

    The last three of us just failed. :p
     
  16. Ancient Aussie

    Ancient Aussie Well-Known Member

    On Topcat7's original post I seen the pics of the two coins, but a few hours later they had disappeared with only the links there, that lead to an error message.
     
  17. Topcat7

    Topcat7 Still Learning

    I don;t know what happened, but here are the photos again. Capture 5.PNG Capture 6.JPG
     
    chrsmat71 likes this.
  18. TIF

    TIF Always learning.

    I like the way the second set shows the lovely iridescence but the first set is better all around. I vote to keep trying until you get a set that shows the iridescence and is well-lit and in focus.

    Thank goodness for digital photography! Can you imagine if we were all this picky about photos when it meant paying someone to develop actual film?
     
    Alegandron and Topcat7 like this.
  19. dougsmit

    dougsmit Member

    +1 to the first paragraph and +100 to the last. I have boxes of photos of my coins taken with film cameras and printed on 20th century photo paper. None are as good as the digital photos I have taken since 2000. I should just dump them all in the trash but that seems so heartless considering the time and money put into them. My grandson was born in 2002 after I went digital. His baby pictures are better and cost less than his mother's but I can't reshoot those old film photos of her like I did with the coins.
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  20. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    I guess my eye isn't developed well enough to see what makes Image #1 superior to Image #2. I don't notice much difference in focus or contrast between them.

    I'm totally in favor of Image #2 due to the iridescence. Maybe that hypnotized me.

    If this were a "for sale" thread and I were a shopper, it is Image #2 that would be much more likely to sell me on this coin.

    I do say ditto to @TIF and @dougsmit's comments about not lamenting the passage of film photography for this application. I can't imagine.

    A friend of mine down the street had a computer and scanner in 1998, and a pretty good scanner at that. He scanned an image of one of my coins. When I realized he could then send that image anywhere in the world, and I could share it with friends, that was what converted me to the Internet, which I had hitherto resisted the idea of. The rest is history.
     
    Theodosius likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page