GtG PCGS Columbian

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by DysfunctionalVeteran, May 26, 2017.

  1. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    No he didn't, he linked their dictionary page of coin terms. My point was that people who seems to think getting high grades is the easiest and that they just sit down and "i.e., of setting the grade based on what the market will swallow." aka put the max possible grade on something are almost always people that have little to no experience grading them. The market grading aspect is a small part of the grading equation and often times you can see it reflected more with holding back coins that would be low end for the next grade up where there is a big jump with the other big impact being what color is acceptable.

    If the OPs coin was market graded it would be at least a 65. A common 64 for that date is about a 100 dollar coin if that, if that coin went to auction it should sell for much closer to 65 money. The one thing the OPs coins did show very well though is how much the type of picture can impact what grade people will guess. The first pictures had muted luster, the last picture shows the luster pretty well.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. heavycam.monstervam

    heavycam.monstervam Outlaw Trucker & Coin Hillbilly

    Youre telling me THIS is a 64 ????
    Look at all those scrapes, cuts, scratches and wear from circulation/mishandling. Look at all the interruptions in the toning and luster
    65???? Haaaaa not even close 20170528_143606.jpg
    I hate to dog another mans prize coin.
    Wheres @Insider he will put this to rest
    (mike diamond style)
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2017
  4. bsshog40

    bsshog40 Senior Member

    I think these are hard to grade by pictures. Examples, Both of these are 64.
    2017-05-28 17.51.27.jpg
    2017-05-28 17.52.11.jpg
     
  5. DysfunctionalVeteran

    DysfunctionalVeteran Oddly enough

    This isn't the prize coin; I haven't inherited those beauties just yet. When I do, y'all will know. :)
     
    Paddy54 likes this.
  6. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    We are looking at images. PCGS had the coin in hand. If there were breaks in the luster it would not have been graded a 64. I don't always agree with the services but with this coin I do. The quality of the images in this thread created the differences in opinions.
     
    baseball21 and jtlee321 like this.
  7. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    I guessed 64 before I saw the grade posted. nice color

    Here's one that NGC graded MS65:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 29, 2017
    Seattlite86 likes this.
  8. DysfunctionalVeteran

    DysfunctionalVeteran Oddly enough

    What's strange to me is I see the effect of what looks to be minor pitting similar to what one might see on a blue and unkempt shotgun.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page