Valpo - we all know what you are saying, and we all agree with you. Or perhaps I should say we all understand the underlying intent of your words, and we all agree with that intent. But I don't think you understand my intent. By your own words you're beginner in the hobby. And what I'm trying to do anyway is to help you, to teach you one of the most basic things you need to know, not argue with you. In numismatics toning and tarnish are exactly the same thing - exactly ! Yes, both words have different connotations, and I explained that early on this discussion. Toning has a positive connotation, and tarnish has a negative connotation. And it is that and that alone that decides the how, why, and when of people using the two words. But that doesn't change the fact that toning and tarnish are both the result of oxidation. And since they are both the result of oxidation they are obviously both the same thing. What you are doing is trying to use the the two words to describe the different stages of oxidation. You are using toning to describe the early stages of oxidation and tarnish to describe the late stages of oxidation. But what I think you don't understand is that all toning, even that which is the most pleasing to the eye, that which we find the most desirable, will eventually turn into that which you wish to call tarnish. You also need to realize that toning is a word that is used only in numismatics when one is discussing oxidation, it is only used in reference to coins. If a silver bar, or a silver spoon, or silver tableware of any kind, or silver jewelry shows oxidation, one would never say that it is toning. You say it is tarnished. But those other silver implements show the exact same colors that silver coins do. And if copper, or brass, or bronze objects show oxidation, one would never say they are toning. You would say they have tarnished. But if copper, brass, or bronze coins oxidize you would say they have toned. That's what I mean when I say toning is only used in numismatics. And people specifically use the word toning when talking about coins because to say they were tarnished would be a bad thing. And people don't want to talk about the things they love and enjoy in a bad way. So they use the word toning instead because toning, when it is attractive, is thought of as being a good thing. Even though both are exactly the same thing. Toning is used precisely because it is a psychological euphemism. And the article you quoted, that's exactly what Mike is doing in that article. And if you wish, I can get him to tell you that himself. Now I can't "make" you believe any of this, nobody can. You have to be willing to accept it, you have to make a conscious choice to accept it. But if you really wish to be a part of numismatics, to study and learn numismatics, you will accept it because everybody in numismatics does. It is a given, it's not even open to question. And I'm only explaining all of this to you for your own benefit.
Otherwise known as - mass self-delusion. A lot of coin people have deluded themselves that they can somehow hold toning in stasis at precisely the most attractive point in the process and can arrest the process right there. 1) It can't be done, and 2) It especially can't be done with copper alloys. Yes, it can be slowed down, but not stopped.
But it does change, it is constantly changing. But you/we don't notice the change because it happens gradually. Any and all coins begin toning the moment they are minted, and that toning never stops, not ever. This is because the only way it can stop is if air removed from the equation. And if air is not removed then the toning will not stop. Yes, it may happen slowly, but it is still happening. If pictures could be taken with the same camera, identical settings and lighting, etc etc, over the period of even just 1 year - a change in the toning would be noticeable with close scrutiny. So even though we think it doesn't change in our lifetime, it absolutely does.
Doug, he means perceptible change. A rainbow toned coin encapsulated in TPG plastic and stored properly in a climate controlled low humidity atmosphere will not experience a perceptible change in our lifetimes. Furthermore, rainbow toned coins are the product of a sulfur laden source such as paper, coin album, or canvas bag. Once the coin has been removed from the sulfur source, the rainbow toning stops. You are describing toning that results via hydrogen sulfide gas in the atmosphere which is already an extremely slow process without the assistance of heat & humidity.
They're popular because they can look amazing and they aren't a dime a dozen. I could go on eBay right now and search for a MS 1938-S Jefferson nickel and have THOUSANDS of plain old white ones to choose from. Good luck going on and finding one like this:
I simply have not found what you say here to be true. I have so-called MS65RD copper (1909 cents, all varieties) in top-end (NGC) plastic, and not only isn't it RD, it's not even RB. These babies are pure BN today. They've been in the NGC plastic in my collection for 20 years now. Not much of a lifetime, that. I realize that people who deal in "toners" have a business model to protect, but frankly, that's not my problem. The fundamental instability of toners is.
Baloney! 1955 PR67CAM nickel. Rainbow toned. Changed not just perceptibly, but RADICALLY in under 5 years.
Kurt, you live out among the farms and horses and buggies, right? Lots of nice, fresh, organic fertilizer being distributed on a regular basis? I remember that smell very well, and I remember what chemicals are associated with it. (Indoles and organic acids and cresols, while stinky, don't contain sulfur -- but H2S rides along with them.)
Yes, now I do. But during the period of the 5 years when the nickel went radical, I was in a suburb of Reading known as Wyomissing. Tres chic. Tres upscale.
Well, the town was founded by Nazi sympathizers and Taylor Swift still lived here then, but other than that... I have owned numerous toned coins over well more than 25 years, and not a single one is stable. They all change all the time. One thing we do have is unbearably oppressive summer humidity. Not New Orleans style, but bad enough.
I know/knew exactly what he meant Paul. But my comment stands. Change does occur and is constantly doing so. The word you used, perceptible, is exactly the same thing I was saying. But the reason it the change is not perceptible, to our minds, is because we look at the coins from time to time. So we don't consciously notice the change when it is happening. At least most people don't because they don't have the memory for it, most people are not capable of noticing small changes, especially over time. But cameras are. You get any coin you want, take pics, every year. Then after 10 years compare pic 1 with pic 10. You will see the change. Personally I think you'll see it after 1, but I guarantee you, or anybody else, will see it after 10.
Doug's right on this. (Troubling, right? ) The key is to hold a "toner" for quite a few years and NOT keep looking at it. I promise you that when you take it out, you will barely recognize it. It WILL HAVE changed, and not by just a little bit, either. My 1955 proof nickel is the outlier. No other slabbed toned coin I ever had changed as much as that one did as fast as it did. But they all do.
I was talking about silver coinage. Copper is extremely reactive which is why the TPG's won't guarantee the RD designation indefinitely. I'm not protecting a business model, just sharing my experience with rainbow toned coinage, which is extensive compared to most other collectors, including yourself. There is no instability in collecting toned coins. If you have proof, then show it.
I purchased this coin in 2002 via Heritage auction. I sold it in 2012 and there was no perceptible change in the appearance of the coin. As far as your proof nickel Kurt, have you ever considered that the coin was artificially toned and that the reactive agent that caused the toning was still on the coin? Typically, when you see a toner turn, it was an AT coin to begin with. I've never seen a bag toned Morgan Dollar change significantly if stored properly.
Coins will simply not tone in a vacuum. TPG containers are not vacuum sealed. They are sonically sealed at the facility along with the air. It's hard to maintain a vaccum at 1ATM, or 15 PSI of pressure bearing down on us. Another way to prevent toning is to sonically seal the coin's with one of the noble gasses. And let's face it the TPG's could do a better job of sealing holders. The amount of air contained in a slab will not turn a coin from Red to brown, without a leak in it. The new and older holders both have leaks. If you don't believe me take your slab and dunk it into liquid 2-methyl butane and you will see that your slab is porus indeed. Our Declaration of Independence is stored in a glass container filled with pure inert Argon gas . I personally use a vacuum sealer with non reactive plastic to slow down any toning with my Dansco and Whitman folders. It's worked great so far. I open them once a year insert the coins of the year and back into the vaccun bag they go. The only way to insure that your coins will truly be protected for all time is to send them into orbit. But for the high end collector hopefully someone will invent a holder that doesn't leak with something other than air, like Argon inside it. Cheers to the future inventor of this product. I'll submit one or two at a $200 submission fee. I don't know if I would invest in such a company if it incorporated. Hopefully it'll just be a LLC.