Please Grade my Grade - Buffalo Nickels - Rev. Proof Dies & More

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by iPen, May 2, 2017.

  1. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    These are the buffalo nickels that I (tried) to grade. As mentioned in my recent Wheat cent thread of the same theme, small coins poses a new grading challenge to me since I've been so focused on much larger silver coins.

    Anyway, I've included below what I think are the grades that would be given to the coins by either PCGS or NGC. However, I'm probably off by a noticeable margin. :/

    And, I noticed that some of the buffalo nickels in fact are made from reverse proof dies! Specifically, both of the 1916 buffalo nickels have the distinct diagonal line on the left rim. But, unfortunately, the clear die deterioration excludes it from being a proof strike candidate, among other missing qualities.

    What do you think the grades are for these buffalo nickels? If you click on "Spoiler", the grade I think they would get will be revealed.

    Thanks in advance!


    1. 1913 Type 2

    MS-62 or MS-63

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    ----------------------------------------

    2. 1916 #1


    MS-64 or UNC Details Obverse Scratched right of feather

    Reverse proof die! But business strike due to die deterioration...

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    ----------------------------------------

    3. 1916 #2

    MS-65

    Reverse proof die! But business strike due to die deterioration...

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    ----------------------------------------

    4. 1936

    MS-63

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    ----------------------------------------

    5. 1937

    MS-66

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 2, 2017
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    I am in, just not after happy hour.
    Nice Buff's though.
     
  4. Coinman1974

    Coinman1974 Research, Research, Research

    Not up for grading, but did want to say Beautiful Buffalo's!
     
  5. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank

    well, nice, but I disagree with all of your grades
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  6. kanga

    kanga 65 Year Collector

    I agree with Treashunt.
    And proof coins CAN grade lower than 60.
    Plus I don't think Buffs came in reverse proofs.
     
  7. Daniel Lowery

    Daniel Lowery Active Member

    Agree. I feel if I took them in to grade they would almost all come back vf/xf.
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  8. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    I bet it's my photography skills lol.

    I used very intense indirect lighting, by diffusing direct light with a very intense light source (sounds counterproductive lol).

    The last one for sure is MS-66, though...
     
  9. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    Oh I was referring to this proof diagnostic on the reverse below.

    I guess I should have reworded that lol.

    upload_2017-5-3_10-50-34.png
     
  10. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    Here's a photo of a Morgan silver dollar that I took using the exact same setup.

    The photo makes it look worse than what it is IMHO. The coin may look to some as AU or MS-60/61 at best based on just the photo alone, especially due to its dull, lack luster appearance; but I can assure you that it's at least the grade shown in the spoiler.

    I think that my camera has a conservative coin grading filter! :facepalm:o_O


    MS-64

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2017
  11. Blissskr

    Blissskr Well-Known Member

    I'm also in the camp that your grades are all off, imo you have all of them over graded. What are you using as a grading guide?
     
  12. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    General ANA grading guidelines, a lot of which is influenced by Morgan and Peace dollar grading. Additionally, PCGS Photograde for these "small" coins.
     
  13. sambyrd44

    sambyrd44 Well-Known Member

    The coins in question all of them with the exception of the bottom coin the 1937 are not even mint state. These will come back as either genuine or AU or below. Look at other coins to get a better idea what you are seeing on these coins. There is wear and the surfaces on a few are not original. You would not be the first though to send coins like these in for certification and maybe you should do so we all learn in our own ways. The coin attached is my own image and coin it is a good example of a Buffalo with no wear. Regardless of grades Buffalo's rock :) 1913.JPG
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
  14. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    Yeah, Buffalo nickels seem a bit underrated, at least at mint state.

    I'll probably submit #1 and #3, and see what they come back as.
     
  15. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    Here's buffalo nickel #3 with better photography:

    upload_2017-5-3_13-1-49.png
    upload_2017-5-3_13-2-16.png
     
  16. thomas mozzillo

    thomas mozzillo Well-Known Member

     
  17. thomas mozzillo

    thomas mozzillo Well-Known Member

    Your posting too many coins for me to eventry to guess at the grade. Please slow down a bit.
     
  18. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I don't agree with any of the grades.
     
    sambyrd44 likes this.
  19. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    lol It's probably a mix of both my terribad pics and re-learning to grade "smaller" coins. Bit I'll have to use natural daylight for my photos next time - my pics come out much sharper with natural light.

    Here's coin #1 again but taken with different photography:

    upload_2017-5-5_6-0-46.png
    upload_2017-5-5_6-1-5.png


    Yeah, I try to post it all at once before I forget lol. The other pics on this thread though are of the same coins.
     
  20. buffnixx

    buffnixx Active Member

    business strike buffs with this distinctive reverse die line can be found for 1913 type 2, 1914, 1915, and 1916 (as shown here) also 1917, 1915s, and 1916d. There are
    probably more. When they were done making proofs some of the dies were then pressed into service to a make business strikes.
     
    sambyrd44 likes this.
  21. iPen

    iPen Well-Known Member

    Ok, the grades are in.

    #2 and #4 were not sent to PCGS for grading.

    Here are the grades:

    #1:
    AU-58

    #3:
    MS-63

    #5:
    MS-66
     
    Pickin and Grinin likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page