Washington Cent 1791

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Eduard, Aug 25, 2007.

  1. Eduard

    Eduard Supporter**

    Hello,
    Can i please have your opinions on this Washington 1791 one cent piece. Unlike most of my other older US coins, i bought this one not at auction, but at from a dealer in Belgium. For this reason i would like to have some confirmation of its authenticity.

    The coin has all the edge lettering, and it weighs 12.32 grams. I believe this weigth is in-line with what it should be according to the Red Book which i have. Your comments, includings your opinions of this coins' grade are very welcome.
    Thanks,
    Eduard
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. monkeyman

    monkeyman Coin Hoarder

    I dont know if it is authentic but Its a beautiful cent, how much did you pay for it?
     
  4. coinnut

    coinnut Senior Member

    thats a great coin,WOW
     
  5. GDJMSP

    GDJMSP Numismatist Moderator

  6. bqcoins

    bqcoins Olympic Figure Skating Scoring System Expert

    definately cool, regardless of authenticity.
     
  7. rotobeast

    rotobeast Old Newbie

    Very neat piece !
    :)
     
  8. hamman88

    hamman88 Spare some change, sir?

    It isn't going to be worth more than one cent if you continue to touch it.
     
  9. mrbrklyn

    mrbrklyn New Member

    That side lettering beats the dickens off the side lettering of the current washington coin.
    Mond you that the picture of Washington is better as well than the 2007 model. BTW - I think it is a pattern.

    Ruben
     
  10. Magman

    Magman U.S. Money Collector

    oh please.
     
  11. Leadfoot

    Leadfoot there is no spoon

    XF40 is my grade. As others have pointed out, it is not a good idea to put your fingertips on the coin anywhere but the edge (and I would suggest not even there).
     
  12. Danr

    Danr Numismatist

    you are the king of coins
     
  13. Eduard

    Eduard Supporter**

    Thank you for your adivce. I will be sure to be careful handling these coins.
    I like this one, it has a very nice colour. Also, for me it has the historic appeal of a contemporary coins depicting your country's first president.
    What i was unsure of was its authenticity since it was not bought at auction.
    Thank you,
    Eduard
     
  14. JeromeLS

    JeromeLS Coin Fanatic

    It seems to be real. I don't think there is much danger of the patina of that coin being interrupted by your fingers, as there is no lustre left. However is this an american coin ?? Or a token ?
     
  15. Just Carl

    Just Carl Numismatist

    He is not kidding. Finger oils and acids can do massive damage to some coins. The body acids interact with the Cupric Oxide on the coin and will leave a finger print that will never come off. It's your coin so if you don't care, continue holding it like that.
    If you went to the LINK noted by GDJMSP you would have noticed that what you have is NOT exactly a small time coin of little value.
     
  16. Ardatirion

    Ardatirion Où est mon poisson

    Its not an official coin. Its a Washington token. Still, nothing to scoff at: Redbook puts it at 1,000 in EF.
     
  17. hontonai

    hontonai Registered Contrarian

    Someone really ought to invent a term for this category of token - the exact opposite of NCLT - that actually circulated as though it were money even though it was completely unofficial.

    How about CNLT, for Circulating Non-Legal Tender? Or, CIT, for Circulating Illegal Tender?

    The term would apply to Hard Times Tokens, and Conder Tokens, among others, as well as the early US Washington tokens.
     
  18. rlm's cents

    rlm's cents Numismatist

    Would you like to try for medal-coin? It almost seems appropriate in this case. Or is that a sore subject?
     
  19. hontonai

    hontonai Registered Contrarian

    Aside from the fact that a banned member used to harrass everybody by using that oxymoronic term for NCLT, it is inappropriate for the category I'm talking about because it just doesn't apply.

    For centuries there have been times when there simply was not enough official coinage to meet the needs of commerce, which resulted in privately minted substitutes, such as the Washington tokens, Hard Times tokens and Civil War tokens in the US; Conder tokens in England; notgeld in Germany; and others. My suggestion is that a generic name for those tokens, all of which were actually used as if they were money, would be useful, and would help distinguish them from special purpose tokens such as transportation or relephone tokens.
     
  20. rotobeast

    rotobeast Old Newbie

    I'd say his sentence structure was more like Roy's than Aidan.
     
  21. huntsman53

    huntsman53 Supporter**

    Eduard,

    Nice coin! Thanks again for sharing your' collection with us here on Coin talk!

    I do not see anything on the coin that would leave me to believe that it is not authentic! The coin has a a really nice planchet for this early period of U.S. coinage and I believe that it should grade at VF-35 to EF-40! These early pieces are fairly hard to grade as I have not seen any grading standards on them whatsoever and I probably couldn't afford any in book form if I did.


    Frank
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page