I suppose no one has to eat crow here. I'm not gonna clean it. And for all those who said the coin was ruined to begin with... all they had to work on were bad seller pics.
I'd be looking at the sellers other coins based on how this one turned out. Oh, and you've earned a "He shoots!! He scores!!!!!"
Granted, but even based on your pics I would sure advise against dipping that coin. As it is, I thought I saw signs of it in the original pics, but yours make it pretty plain. I don't think it's going to get a clean grade. But who knows, I've been wrong before.
In the new photo, the obverse definitely reminds me of one of the quarters in my collection: I suppose not everyone will like this kind of look, but I think it's quite lovely. Aside from something possibly going on on the cheek and neck area in your photo, I'm not seeing anything jumping out at me that would indicate it wouldn't grade.
That is exactly what I am referring to. I'm thinking the coin suffered an old harsh cleaning. But like I said, we'll see what "they" say. Sometimes they can go either way with these. Nonetheless, the signs are indeed there.
Blow up the obverse image in Post#97. There are diagonal hairlines across the cheek. In spite of that, I believe it has a good chance of being straight graded.
If that's the same coin as the one pictured in post #1, SOMEBODY needs to be darned glad there's no death penalty for crappy photography! Good Lord! If people are taking digital pictures like that, of what use is the Internet? Come on! That's CRIMINAL.
I wasn't going to say anything until you posted your pictures. I see a lovely problem-free EF-45. It will probably get pushed to AU-50.