Yeah or Nea?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Rushmore, Sep 11, 2026 at 11:46 PM.

  1. Rushmore

    Rushmore Coin Addict

    kountryken and SensibleSal66 like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    It's a PASS for me. Bad condition plus you can't tell that it's an 1872.
     
  4. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    Looks more like an 1873 or 1878.
     
    kountryken, Muzyck, KBBPLL and 3 others like this.
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I think the price is to high for the poor grade. I would hold off for a nicer coin in better condition even if it cost more.
     
    Troodon, kountryken and SensibleSal66 like this.
  6. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic numismatist Moderator

    While I won't address the price (it could be OK considering the coin is a better date), I'd definitely hold out for a problem free example, even if in lower grade.

    That being said, it doesn't look totally awful. It's entirely up to you what you consider acceptable (or not) for your own collection.
     
    Troodon, kountryken and SensibleSal66 like this.
  7. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    Nay. Too low ball for me.

    NGC has it listed PrAg for $80.00 so it seems like a good price/deal.

    I would like/be happy over the price for this keydate, but I think I would be unhappy with the coin.
     
    kountryken and SensibleSal66 like this.
  8. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    I would need to see it in person, hard to tell the date.
     
  9. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Supporter! Supporter

    i agree. Enlarged it looks a dead ringer for 1878.
     
  10. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    For a key date, I'd want the date to be clear enough that there is no doubt.
     
    Troodon, Spark1951 and kountryken like this.
  11. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Might look better in hand but the pic says no thanks.
     
    kountryken likes this.
  12. BRandM

    BRandM Counterstamp Collector

    I wouldn't touch it either. The date is "iffy" and condition very poor. It's your choice though so go for it if you like it.

    Bruce
     
    kountryken likes this.
  13. kountryken

    kountryken Well-Known Member

    I have bought coins in similar condition as "hole fillers" until I could find a better one. If I didn't find a better one, then I, at least had one. I agree with the others that this looks a lot like a 1878. But, the worn 2 can look like an 8. In hand you may be able to read the date better? Like has been pointed out, it's what you are happy with. I totally understand having a tight budget. But, I would try my best to make sure the date is legible. If there is a return option, you could buy it, and if the date wasn't good enough, return it. But, check out the return policy very carefully. Sometimes the return gets expensive. Bottom line is, do you like it enough to maybe have it for a very long time? Can you increase your budget enough to get a better one? The one that needs to be happy with the purchase is you.
     
    Troodon likes this.
  14. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    This is an extremely important point. If you have a monthly budget for coins, often it is worth it to wait an extra month or two while you are searching for the exact right coin for your set. By the time you find the right coin, you'll have saved enough to afford it.

    Don't rush to buy a "compromise" coin just because you want it. Patience is a key part of collecting.
     
    kountryken and Mr. Numismatist like this.
  15. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    Looked again, and that is a 1878. That’s a flattened last 8.

    Numismedia/FMV has G4/$28.00. PrAg would be about $20.00 USD.
     
    Last edited: Sep 12, 2026 at 3:50 PM
  16. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I can see that it’s a 1878 after looking a second time. You can see the curves in the second 8 almost as good as the curves in the first 8. @Spark1951 is correct. I looked time and it’s definitely an 1878.
     
    kountryken and Spark1951 like this.
  17. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I can see that it’s a 1878 after looking a second time. You can see the curves in the second 8 almost as good as the curves in the first 8. @Spark1951 is correct. I looked time and it’s definitely an 1878.
     
  18. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I can see that it’s a 1878 after looking a second time. You can see the curves in the second 8 almost as good as the curves in the first 8. @Spark1951 is correct. I looked time and it’s definitely an 1878.
     
  19. mark_h

    mark_h Somewhere over the rainbow

    Agree with the Nays - as mention it looks like an 1878.
     
    kountryken likes this.
  20. kountryken

    kountryken Well-Known Member

    Ok. I looked because I have a bad habit of keeping a coin I've replaced/upgraded, unless it gets to be cost prohibitive. Here is the 1872 I replaced. It's not great, but you can see the date. The "STATES" is about gone, I think? Otherwise, just a very badly worn coin. Now, I'm not trying to talk you in to "taking a coin off my hands". Like I said, I keep them unless I can't afford to. But, I like helping someone, if I can. If you're interested in this extra coin I have, PM me and think about what you've got you'd be willing to trade? You won't hurt my feelings if you decide to save for a better one.
    20260912_204301.jpg 20260912_204311.jpg
     
  21. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    Nice clear date on a solid, problem free coin, with great color. This is an improvement on the OP ebay coin in every way.
     
    Spark1951 and kountryken like this.

Share This Page