Please Grade This 1892-O Barber Half

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Eduard, Sep 3, 2026 at 3:59 AM.

  1. Eduard

    Eduard Supporter** Supporter

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Gilbert

    Gilbert Part time collector Supporter

    AU55
     
    dwhiz likes this.
  4. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    55
     
    dwhiz likes this.
  5. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    At first I was thinking 60 but second look 58
     
  6. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

    AU58 ot UNC cleaned... does the luster show cleaning?
     
  7. ElishaCollectsForever

    ElishaCollectsForever Young Man Collector

  8. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

  9. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

  10. Publius2

    Publius2 Well-Known Member

    53. Interesting weak strike on reverse from upper right wing down to right claw.
     
    Dynoking likes this.
  11. Jeffjay

    Jeffjay Well-Known Member

    AU 55. An excellent example of a key date
     
  12. Dynoking

    Dynoking Well-Known Member

    Great observation. I did my best to study overlay photos. It seems to me that metal that didn't flow into the claw would have gone into the forehead hair, but that doesn't look like a particularly sharp strike either. Or am I looking at this from the wrong standpoint?
     
  13. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    I see a weak strike on the reverse but wear in the hair and Liberty band. First thought was AU58 but maybe that's too generous.
     
    samclemens3991 likes this.
  14. samclemens3991

    samclemens3991 Well-Known Member

    I too was at AU-58. Just don'y know the true in hand luster. James
     
  15. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I’m at an AU-55 on this one.
     
    Jeffjay likes this.
  16. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins Supporter

    Seeing mushiness on the tail feathers and base of the arrows (reverse) but I don't think that's due to wear but rather weakness of strike. MS-62
     

Share This Page