Error? 75th Edition of Red Book

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by CoinCorgi, Jul 5, 2026 at 6:44 PM.

  1. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Well, butter my butt and call me a biscuit!

    Can you spot the printing error on Page 118?

    Page 118.jpg

    Red Book 75th edition.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2026 at 7:18 PM
    LakeEffect likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. LakeEffect

    LakeEffect Average Circulated

    2008? I believe the copper plated zinc cents actually lasted until 2012 when they were replaced by dilithium plated kryptonite. I could be wrong.
     
  4. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Well, butter my butt and call me a biscuit!

    [​IMG]
     
    LakeEffect likes this.
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Either the price on the 1980-D or the 1992, close AM.
     
  6. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    I think it is the 1982S small date. I’ve always thought the proof was a large date.
     
  7. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Just ask @paddyman98. He's our resident error expert. ;)
     
    -jeffB likes this.
  8. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    Footnote (b) describes the Wide AM but the listings with (b) are Close AM?
     
  9. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Well, butter my butt and call me a biscuit!

    Correct. You noticed the misprint that I noticed. In every other reference (including an actual 1982-S proof coin in my possession) says the 1982S is a large date.

    I don't know if you are correct or not. I have not looked into it. I only posted this because I noticed the "1982S Small Date" misprint. Thanks for playing! lol
     
  10. CoinCorgi

    CoinCorgi Well, butter my butt and call me a biscuit!

    Older Red Books actually never specified whether the 1982S proof was a large or small.
     
  11. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    close-am-wide-am-1-jpg-332594135.jpg

    The listing section is correct - the 1992 and 1992D Close AM varieties are rare and valuable. I think footnote (b) is wrong. Varieties were made using proof dies with a close space between A and M, not wide. People reading the footnote are going to think they struck it rich with their normal 1992 WAM.
     

Share This Page