1970 Lincoln cent missing jaw Lamination

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by eric6794, Jun 30, 2026 at 5:57 PM.

  1. eric6794

    eric6794 Well-Known Member

    This was an amazing find in pocket change today considering getting cents in change is becoming less frequent. One of my best lamination finds in change.
    WIN_20260630_17_44_41_Pro.jpg WIN_20260630_17_44_54_Pro.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    That is a spectacular find. Thanks for sharing.

    If that reverse die was a bit more abraded, it would have also been a better-looking Floating Roof ;)
     
  4. Randy Abercrombie

    Randy Abercrombie Supporter! Supporter

    Not an error collector but that's pretty cool!
     
  5. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Cool struck thru.
     
    eric6794 and SensibleSal66 like this.
  6. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    A lamination means that it is attached right? If there is still a peal on the surface, a lamination crack, then it is a lamination. I see it as a loss of lamination.
     
  7. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    That’s a spectacular delaminated coin.
     
    JPD3 and eric6794 like this.
  8. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    I was going to say I think it's delaminated. And if the piece of metal was still attached then it's a lamination. Still an error, but I think they like it with the piece attached.
     
  9. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Yep. Well, as they say, You can't have your cake and Edith too". It was in a Hallmark card. :smuggrin:
     
    Michael K and eric6794 like this.
  10. eric6794

    eric6794 Well-Known Member

    I posted this on a Facebook error variety page and it's funny that there are people saying it's not a lamination error. One person said that only Nickels can have lamination errors another said only modern cents can have lamination errors because pre 82 were 95% copper and not laminated like the new ones lol
     
  11. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Those pages are full of many members that have absolutely no knowledge of true Mint Errors. They never admit they are wrong when corrected.
    Many are stubborn, ignorant and very annoying people!
     
    SensibleSal66, eric6794 and Michael K like this.
  12. No_Ragrets

    No_Ragrets Self-proclaimed Semi-Amateur Numismatist Supporter

    Please correct me if I'm wrong (like seriously, please correct if incorrect) but I believe there are two... types(?) of lamination errors. One where it is still attached, and another being a detached lamination.

    I am very intrigued by the world of error coins, and am admittedly still learning them, so take my statement with a grain of salt until someone more experienced chimes in.

    On another note, my LCS had sent in a very crazy type of lamination error that I'd never seen before. It was a copper Lincoln Memorial cent, essentially had his face peeled back partly, with the design still clearly visible underneath the peel-back spot. I need to ask him how it came back from grading next visit.
     
    SensibleSal66 and eric6794 like this.
  13. No_Ragrets

    No_Ragrets Self-proclaimed Semi-Amateur Numismatist Supporter

    That's a really cool find, and in pocket change!? Awesome!
     
    SensibleSal66 and eric6794 like this.
  14. eric6794

    eric6794 Well-Known Member

    My coin is a delamination, I just clump delamination in with lamination error @Michael K is right about desirability it much cooler to find one with the attached lamination but that is so hard to find
     
  15. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    Here is one from my collection
    1960DLam.jpg

    And after I sent it to NGC for error attribution
    lam1.JPG
     
    No_Ragrets, Eric the Red and eric6794 like this.
  16. eric6794

    eric6794 Well-Known Member

    without a doubt, there's an old saying
     
    paddyman98 likes this.
  17. No_Ragrets

    No_Ragrets Self-proclaimed Semi-Amateur Numismatist Supporter

    This is the coin I'm referring to. Any thoughts about it? 20260313_120624.jpg 20260313_120621.jpg 20260313_120640.jpg 20260313_120602.jpg 20260313_120557.jpg 20260313_120543.jpg 20260313_120516.jpg
     
    SensibleSal66 and eric6794 like this.
  18. Heavymetal

    Heavymetal Supporter! Supporter

  19. eric6794

    eric6794 Well-Known Member

  20. eric6794

    eric6794 Well-Known Member

    no its not damage
     
  21. Heavymetal

    Heavymetal Supporter! Supporter

    My response was to the 1966 cent, not yours
     
    No_Ragrets likes this.

Share This Page