What in the heck? A little help please!

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by No_Ragrets, Jan 20, 2026 at 4:02 PM.

  1. No_Ragrets

    No_Ragrets Self-proclaimed Semi-Amateur Numismatist Supporter

    I just picked this one up today, but wasn't overly certain about what actually happened to this coin until I got it under my scope. Looking through the old Capital Plastic holder in the shop with a loupe only lead to confusion with minimal ideas as to what this is.

    Once at home, I took it out of the holder and put it under the scope. I was absolutely floored by seeing this, and I'm still thoroughly confused as to what the heck happened to this coin.

    Design transfer on both obverse and reverse, but right-side-up and left to right lettering (as in all of it). What I thought in the shop to be a major die crack (or maybe planchet flaw?) on the reverse ends up being Lincoln's silhouette, but not inverted like a clash.

    So, what are your thoughts on this coin? The only feasible thing I can come up with is that it's double-struck, but with the coin being flipped over between strikes for getting both designs on each side of the coin. Crazy as it sounds, that's the only thing that's coming to my mind. Maybe another bored mint employee special? Thanks for any help!

    I'll post some additional scope pictures soon. Here's what Ive got so far.
    20260120_145627.jpg 20260120_152245.jpg 20260120_145649.jpg 20260120_145720.jpg 20260120_145643.jpg 20260120_145739.jpg 20260120_152307.jpg 20260120_152621.jpg 20260120_152803.jpg 20260120_152724.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

  4. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    Looks like the real deal, and if it is, it's a whopper of a coin!
     
    No_Ragrets likes this.
  5. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    I have one similar to that that is also a flip over strike. Yours is a very nice one.
     
    No_Ragrets likes this.
  6. No_Ragrets

    No_Ragrets Self-proclaimed Semi-Amateur Numismatist Supporter

    So I guess I owe the shopkeeper a sandwich then? He told me if it ends up being something great to buy him a sandwich or something. Got it for $10:happy:
     
    Tall Paul likes this.
  7. No_Ragrets

    No_Ragrets Self-proclaimed Semi-Amateur Numismatist Supporter

    Do you think something like this was deliberately done? I've seen a handful of double struck coins but not one of them like this where it's 100% on each side.
     
  8. ToughCOINS

    ToughCOINS Dealer Member Moderator

    This can happen, but it is quite unusual. Very cool.
     
  9. Tall Paul

    Tall Paul Supporter! Supporter

    You should at least get him a steak dinner. That coin is stunning.
     
  10. calcol

    calcol Supporter! Supporter

    Not an error expert. Is it possible to determine the difference between a coin that flipped as 1st strike ended and stayed between the dies and a struck coin that got into the planchet bin and got struck again later?

    Either way, it's a cool coin. Mike
     
  11. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    It appears to be a genuine in-collar flip-over double-strike. A thorough search of the internet shows these to be... rare.

    As for "mint-assisted errors"... the general consensus is that if it was done at the mint, it's cool.

    I see nothing on your coin to raise red flags, but I would absolutely, 100% recommend getting it certified for authenticity. If it is in fact real, that error is worth many hundreds of dollars.

    Wait for it to come back as genuine, first. But yes, if real he deserves a very nice steak indeed.
     
  12. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    No, there is not. The end result would be exactly the same, especially for the same date/denomination.

    A coin getting stuck in the canvas bin and then getting struck again later is the leading cause of off-planchet strickes (a quarter struck over a nickel, for example). Or a 1986 being struck over a 1985.

    But a cent struck over a cent could have just not been ejected from the coining chamber properly, for some reason. No way to tell.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page