Should there be fewer MS grades and a suffix to indicated dings on circulated coins?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by calcol, Jan 18, 2026 at 12:45 PM.

  1. calcol

    calcol Supporter! Supporter

    Keep in mind that MS coins are judged mostly on dings and scratches … a MS60 has a lot more than a MS65. However, circulated coins are judged mostly on wear … a XF has more than an AU. But an AU55 or AU58 coin can be a lot more attractive than a low-grade MS coin. If not for the slight wear, it might have graded MS66 or MS67.

    There is a mystique about uncirculated coins that they must be more attractive than any circulated coin. After all, they are Mint State. And this idea is usually reflected in their value.

    I think there should fewer MS grades. 11 is too many, and plus and sticker grades make things worse. And perhaps a suffix letter for circulated grades to indicate the number of dings and scratches … 40a and 40b for example.

    Many times, I’ve looked at XF or AU coins and thought, “Yeah, very little wear.” But some look like they’ve barely been handled. Others look like a herd of cattle trampled them.

    Mike
     
    -jeffB likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic numismatist Moderator

    I agree with you mostly, especially when it comes to plus grades.
     
  4. longnine009

    longnine009 Darwin has to eat too. Supporter

    Not only that but does: "buy the highest grade coin that you can afford" make sense anymore? How long has that mantra been around, a hundred years?
    Back when someone thought that up grades went from Extra Fine to Uncirculated. There was a big difference in how each looked. It may have made sense to pass on a Extra Fine at $1 for an Unc at $2. Today there is little difference between grades and big differences between prices.
     
    calcol likes this.
  5. -jeffB

    -jeffB Greshams LEO Supporter

    ...and the grading standards keep slipping and sliding, so that 65 you stretched for ten years ago might be an albatross - unless you pay to have it crossed or reconsidered to be a 67 by today's standards, or pile beans onto it.

    The winning move is to "buy the coin, not the slab", possibly raw, if you're confident in your grading ability. But then the 65 you bought, which would be a 67 from today's graders, will suddenly be a 62 to the person you're trying to sell it to.
     
    calcol likes this.
  6. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    It was simpler before but at this point I would not eliminate any of the grades. It would likely cause more issues and make it confusing when you are comparing an "older" holdered MS 63 to a "new" MS 60a.

    The one "innovation" that has popped up in the last few years is the NGCX 10 point grading scale. That does not appear to have caught on besides VaultBox and other mystery game slabs.
     
  7. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Supporter! Supporter

    Just my opinion but if I'm paying good money for a slabbed coin, I'm not playing that stupid game with that ridiculous reinventing of the wheel...........unless I'm planning on cracking it out or doing a crossover attempt upgrade at PCGS. I'm on the fence as to what I think of CAC other than I'll buy the coins in their slab if I like them enough. I have a couple of them.
     
    -jeffB and lordmarcovan like this.
  8. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan Eclectic numismatist Moderator

    I for one want no part of that NGC X 10-point scale.
     
    -jeffB, calcol and Barney McRae like this.
  9. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Supporter! Supporter

    Yeah. And I don't think that is catching on either. I'm seeing fewer and fewer of them for sale in the past 6 months. All it is good for is confusing new collectors.
     
  10. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    To me mint state means it should look the day it was struck.
    Uncirculated and full luster. Way too many coins that circulated and have scratches and poor luster get graded MS. "Oh those are bag marks."
    You know I don't care. A nick and a gouge should be a demerit no matter where they came from. And they aren't always correct in their assessment. "Oh that coin was struck with a planchet flaw." Too bad, it shouldn't be MS in that condition. "Oh those are die polishing lines." Well it detracts from the beauty of the coin. How can they even see through the toning and grade a coin MS? It wasn't toned the day it was struck.
     
    longnine009 likes this.
  11. longnine009

    longnine009 Darwin has to eat too. Supporter

    Another winning move is walk away from the Rent-A-Grade Tower of Babble garbage and collect Exo, where grading is a bore, not a god. Unfortunately, it's hard to completely walk away from something that's so much fun to make fun of.

    And nothing is "Mint State" after it gets punched out of the collar.
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2026 at 3:46 PM
    -jeffB likes this.
  12. silvereagle82

    silvereagle82 World Gold Collector Supporter

    I would agree with having less MS grades.
    Although I like graded (slab) coins, I also buy coins that I find “fit my eye” . I have bought numerous coins “raw” from European auctions.. some graded where I thought, some not mostly due to light cleaning; but the coin was very appealing to the eye.
    I like the quote “buy the coin not the slab” but unfortunately when you eventually have to resell, not everyone agrees with that premise!
     
    -jeffB likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page