How is this a PR-68 DCAM?

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by iPen, Feb 8, 2017.

  1. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    I get the point you are making, but in this instance it is an ultra modern, those other grades shouldn't even exist from what was released.
     
    Paul M. likes this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    Moderns like this are usually graded very quickly. While we all believe it is over graded, in the big scheme of things, it probably has the same value as one graded either PR-66 or PR-67 AT THE MOMENT. As time passes, the value of these "modern" coins will change dramatically. Then, coins like this which some here consider "worthless" and that are not given due diligence at the TPGS will be more appreciated. That's when a mistake such as this MAY cost the TPGS some money.
     
  4. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    They shouldn't but I'll be on the lookout to post some extreme examples of Proof modern's taken from melt buckets. :D
     
  5. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    And that, right there, is what adds so much enjoyment to me from your presence. :rolleyes: You must get an unusual amount of enjoyment out of your self-proclaimed bullheadedness.
     
    Insider likes this.
  6. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    I agree, some of the crap I have gotten from the mint in the mail is just sigh lol.
     
  7. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    Ooh, ooh, I know, I know! He sent in stuff and didn't get astronomical grades, so the system must be fixed. Typical story.
     
  8. chuck123

    chuck123 Active Member

    I'm sorry Mr. Bellman,. I'm not being sarcastic. I am trying to learn just how this could happen. I am not doubting it could happen as I have seen it happen too many times before this. Usually it is at a large function such as FUN where TPG companies are on site or where auction houses are asking high percentages at both ends
     
  9. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    The mint QC is a joke. That is how.
     
    Insider and mikenoodle like this.
  10. V. Kurt Bellman

    V. Kurt Bellman Yes, I'm blunt! Get over your "feeeeelings".

    I kind of agree with you on this thing. I've NEVER seen a scratch on metal that looked like that. I HAVE seen scratches on plastic that look like that. Now, that said, I never say what I've never seen can't exist. It just doesn't sit right from what I see here. I'd like to see this in hand before I'd feel comfortable knowing what I'm seeing.

    The best explanation of what happened here is upthread when @Insider posted this:
    "Moderns like this are usually graded very quickly. While we all believe it is over graded, in the big scheme of things, it probably has the same value as one graded either PR-66 or PR-67 AT THE MOMENT."

    This squares up with what a guest speaker at the Chicago Coin Club said just under two years ago (March 2015). He said that at PCGS moderns are given to inexperienced graders and are told there are only three grades - 68, 69, and 70. It's 70 if you can't find ANY marks, 69 if you see one, and 68 if there's more than one. I believe what we see here confirms that, IF the scratches are on the coin, which while I say it might be better than 50/50 that they are, I'm reluctant to go much higher than that.
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2017
    Paul M. and Dynoking like this.
  11. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    Eminently believable. As I mentioned, with issues like this, anything below 69 might as well be circulated, so there's no real use getting granular on grading.
     
    Paul M., Insider and baseball21 like this.
  12. rmpsrpms

    rmpsrpms Lincoln Maniac

    Hmm, personal and emotional attacks are for sure to get you answers.
     
  13. Insider

    Insider Talent on loan from...

    I :zombie: don't have emotions. That's why I post with the little faces. :shame:

    Try this :angelic:: Pretty please, would you explain your post:

    Are you experienced :bookworm: or just parroting something :yack::yack::confused::wacky::vomit: you heard? Thank you very much! :D
     
  14. 180IQ

    180IQ Active Member

    Does any post mint marking of a coin drop it to PR58?
     
  15. 180IQ

    180IQ Active Member

    If not, and those are the ONLY marks on the coin, I would give it a 68DCAM, it looks great.
     
  16. SuperDave

    SuperDave Free the Cartwheels!

    No, but for a coin which receives special handling at every step in the process, and for which "perfection" is the stated goal, and for which that stated goal is reached quite often....well, something that looks like somebody slipped with a screwdriver should take a substantial hit in grade, not just down to 68. Frankly, as a Proof, that should be a Details coin.
     
    180IQ likes this.
  17. 180IQ

    180IQ Active Member

    The big pics make the smallest marks look so bad, you're probably right. What would a PR details grade be? Just PR details or PR66 details? PRMS details?
     
  18. 180IQ

    180IQ Active Member

    PMS "details"
     
  19. kaosleeroy108

    kaosleeroy108 The Mahayana Tea Shop & hobby center

    OK what TPG graded it ,

    Sent from my C6740N using Tapatalk
     
  20. kaosleeroy108

    kaosleeroy108 The Mahayana Tea Shop & hobby center

    Might be inside plastic scratch

    Sent from my C6740N using Tapatalk
     
  21. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    PCGS or NGC it would be Uncirc Details, ANACS uses a 60 for uncirc details not sure about ICG. Anything below a 69 on 99 percent of Ultra Modern Proofs from the US Mint is essentially a details grade in the market.
     
    180IQ likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page