1982 cent small 2 , weighs 309 grams

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by Incharge, Jun 2, 2025 at 3:52 PM.

  1. Incharge

    Incharge Active Member

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Incharge

    Incharge Active Member

  4. TheGame

    TheGame Well-Known Member

    That's one of the common varieties. 82-D small date in copper is the very rare one.
     
    VistaCruiser69 and Spark1951 like this.
  5. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    …Not only common but also very little eye appeal with the stain on the date.
     
  6. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    Extremely common. The mint made billions of them.
     
    VistaCruiser69 likes this.
  7. paddyman98

    paddyman98 I'm a professional expert in specializing! Supporter

    If you are looking for the super extremely rare Small Date 1982 D mint mark on Copper Planchet.. just forget it. You will drive yourself absolutely nuts and will never find one. I have seen hundreds of posts on this forum, Facebook coin pages and eBay of people thinking they have found one, but they have always been incorrect!

    Only two examples have ever been discovered and properly attributed. Many coin experts doubt that a third example will ever be found o_O
     
  8. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    The crazy part of this whole thing is how many people don't even know what they're looking for. They either think any 1982 small date weighing 3.1g is valuable, or they don't know how to distinguish a small date from a large date.
     
  9. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    LOL.
    forget-about-it-nevermind.gif
     
    VistaCruiser69 and paddyman98 like this.
  10. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Ah. What was the question? 5d4b3caf935075e3f7b835aa_thought-leadership-ohmconnect-t-o-u-rates-emoji.png
     
  11. Eore

    Eore Member

    WANTED - The 1982 D, 3.1 wt. Small date, Lincoln Cent.
    Although, a FULL set of 82's is also tough to find.

    IMG_20250604_014902.jpg 8222 small.png
     
  12. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

  13. Eore

    Eore Member

    I like to think so.
    Oh, you mean the LRC. :cool:
    Bread and butter for most research questions.
     
  14. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    If you mean including the 1982-D small date copper, sure. The other 7 I found pretty easily and then spent them.
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  15. Eore

    Eore Member

    I'm questioning the 3.9 weight he is showing.
    +.3 is the tolerance limit.
     
  16. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    But it says, 3.09 not 3.90. Right? :)
     
  17. Eore

    Eore Member

    I think there's 9 now.
    I save the copper ones and let the zinc ones just fade away.
     
  18. Eore

    Eore Member

    3.1 now add .3 = 3.4
    Now take any Lincoln cent @ 3.9 wt .........never heard of it.
    I could be wrong and that's why I'm throwing it out there.
     
  19. l.cutler

    l.cutler Member

    The scale shows 3.09 not 3.9 two totally different weights. 3.09 is actually a little bit less than 3.1, 3.9 would be quite a bit overweight.
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  20. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    No use. Like talking to a wall. :rolleyes::smuggrin:
     
    Spark1951 and l.cutler like this.
  21. Eore

    Eore Member

    Well, there ya go. Within the tolerance limit.
    3.09
    I would like to see the snowman effect of the 8.
    IMG_20250604_060648.jpg
    Top ring much smaller than the bottom ring of the 8.
    Snowman's head, and his body.
    What?
    That's another way to a small date.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page