Roman coin?

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Patrick M, Apr 26, 2025 at 4:04 PM.

  1. Patrick M

    Patrick M Razor edge MD

    Can anyone please help me identify this coin? Don't know much about ancient coins and I have no idea where to start. Thanks
     

    Attached Files:

    kountryken and Neal like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. derkerlegand

    derkerlegand Well-Known Member

  4. Neal

    Neal Well-Known Member

    TSA =Thessalonica mint, 1st officiana.
     
  5. Victor_Clark

    Victor_Clark all my best friends are dead Romans Dealer

    The reverse legend FEL TEMP REPARATIO roughly translates to “good times are here again”. This reverse possibly alludes to a trip Constans made to Britain to quell an uprising by of a small group of Picts.


    A full description--


    Constans
    A.D. 348-350
    DN CONSTANS PF AVG; pearl-diademed, draped & cuirassed bust right; A behind bust.
    FEL TEMP REPARATIO; Emperor in military dress stg. l., holding Victory on globe and standard with Chi-Rho on banner; in stern sits Victory, steering ship; A in left field.
    In ex. TSA
    RIC VIII Thessalonica 122
     
  6. Patrick M

    Patrick M Razor edge MD

    Thank you very much! Greatly appreciated!
     
    Victor_Clark likes this.
  7. GinoLR

    GinoLR Well-Known Member

    This FEL TEMP REPARATIO reverse with the galley is found on coins of Constantius II and Gallus' coins too. It is not just for Constans.
    The galley with a standard is an old symbol for Felicitas. There are coins of Hadrian, Marcus Aurelius, Lucius Verus, even Carausius, showing a galley with the legend Felicitati.
     
  8. Victor_Clark

    Victor_Clark all my best friends are dead Romans Dealer

    I did not say it was issued only for Constans, I merely gave the possible reason for its issue.

    The two captives FEL TEMP may have been issued to celebrate the victory of the Roman Army under the command of Constantius II at the Battle of Singara, which occurred in A.D. 344; but was not struck only for Constantius II.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page