You are saying different things here. First you say the core is an alloy. Which it is. And then you say it is a copper core, which it is not. And again you say the core is alloyed, which it is. A copper core is copper. Cut open a new half dollar and look inside. A 40% silver half from 1965-1970 does not have a copper core even though the alloy is 79% copper.
According to my count, I mentioned the copper core with regard to the Kennedy Silver Clad Composition 3 times, and in each case I specified its composition as including a specific % silver. Your point is well taken: I should have said "copper alloy core". I mentioned a copper core generally without specifying composition only to indicate - and quote experts who so indicate - that cladding can be pulled over the core by a dull punch. I assumed that anyone reading those comments would understand that they were meant to include cladding of any of the clad compositions of existing coins and a core of any composition (100% copper or a copper alloy) of existing coins. I assumed that a general reference without specifying composition detail would be understandable by those reading the comments. I certainly understood the reference when it was made by the experts I quoted. You are correct that I did not say "Copper Alloy Core" and I did not feel it necessary to explain in each mention that a percentage mixture as I stated was, in fact an alloy. My apologies for that oversight - I certainly assumed anyone reading my comments would understand that. I also apologize that I made an assumption about the statement from those who were insisting I was wrong about the coin in the OP being silver clad because it was instead 40% silver. I assumed they were saying that the coin was a monolithic cuprosilver alloy composed of 40% silver and the remaining % was copper.
Did you ever find out about your coin that weighs 12g? I have a 1965 Kennedy half dollar that also weighs 12g and I am curious to learn more about it.
Welcome to Coin Talk. You need to weigh your coin on a scale that reads in 10ths, or better yet, 100ths of a gram. As noted by @Pete Apple there's a +/ .4 gram weight tolerance for the 1965 Kennedy half. If your scale only gives weights in full grams, a coin weighing 11.8 or 11.9 grams will probably show up as 12 grams. There's also such a thing called rolled thick and rolled thin planchets. So even if your coin weighed a full 12 grams, it could be explained by that. See the following: http://www.error-ref.com/rolled-thick-planchets/
I have the same 1969 d half dollar Kennedy it is all silver even on the edges, my 1969 d Kennedy dollar the rims have been worn off which caused a weight drop. So the only true way to figure this out is figure out how much weight you would lose if their rims was worn off.
This thread is 6 years old. Please start a new thread and post full sized photos of both sides and the edge.