I was setting up my wall display the other day. Realized that I didn't have a Walker type in my Soapbox Anacs slabs collection. I found this one yesterday. This slab is also, if I read correctly, the earliest serial number for Gen 3 slab with a bar code. It was the kicker for me to buy it for the slab collection. Hopefully the pics are clear enough. The serial number is 213226 with bar code.
Oh man Pickin'.... I am terrible at these and buffalo nickels...... Despite this being an absolutely stunning coin, I believe I see the tiniest bit of wear on the eagles chest and lady Liberty's leg. As much as I don't want to, I am going to sat AU58, and I hope I am wrong.
MS-64 It's a 63/64 borderline coin. I'm not sure how conservative or liberal ANACS was back then, but I'll go with 64.
I agree that this coin is borderline MS63/64, but the photos make the luster seem very good so I went high, MS64.
Walkers have always been tough for me to shoot when there is nice luster involved. Add in a slab and they are like this or dull and detailed. I hardly ever hit the sweet spot.
You should check out eBAY. A lot of the big dealers are frauds when it comes to lighting. Not all but there is a basketful I'm aware of. I'll buy an inexperienced individual's attempts way before I'll consider buying from those. That being said, photographing coins is difficult. Ask anyone who has seen my attempts. Pickin's photos are great.
I've got a couple walkers that may be sliders but could also get a MS grade. My best looking one is in my 7070, but I'm absolutely awful at guessing grades on these. I voted 64 because it looks nice. Some breast feathers are worn and the left hand doesn't look promising, but the rest looks nice.
MS 63....great luster with some hits in the fields; maybe it got up to 64 but I think Anacs was more conservative on this one and said 63
My initial impression was MS64 but then I compared it with my PCGS MS65 example, and I didn't see any reason yours shouldn't be MS65 as well. I voted MS65. But since yours is in an earlier slab, it might have been graded more conservatively? I expect that will turn out to be the case. I originally wanted a 1944 for my Walking Liberty type coin, because that was my mother's birthyear. But I ended up going with one from my father's birthyear instead: the 1938-D. It also happens to be a semi-key date, and thus was rather expensive in MS65.
Thanks. It’s fun to own a semi-key date that’s actually in a higher grade than some of the more common date pieces I’ve had in my past type sets.
If you're not too busy AND not to get off track too much, can you explain what makes a coin a key date or a Semi-key date. (No relationship jokes please. ).