While reading, there seems to be some debate over which term to use. So, which do you prefer, and why? Romaion, or Byzantine?
Byzantine. It's the term that's been used for years, and anyone who has researched any Byzantine history knows they are the Roman Empire. (Then again, I'm the guy who also gets offended by 'the dark ages' so I guess I'm a hypocrite...)
i always use the term byzantine, but just because it's more common used....ad FN said. when i made a coin display, labeled a coin as byzantine, but in my test i explained that they were a continuation of the roman empire.
"The people who lived in the "Byzantine Empire" never knew nor used the word "Byzantine." They know themselves to be Romans, nothing more and absolutely nothing less." http://www.romanity.org/htm/fox.01.en.what_if_anything_is_a_byzantine.01.htm
I used the term, "Roman Empire" from Augustus to Constantine I/ Western Roman Empire/ Eastern Roman Empire, after Constantine divided the old Roman Empire, when he became sole Emperor. I start calling the Eastern Roman Empire the so called Byzantine Empire....when Anastasius I became Emperor in 491AD.
The Romans may have never used the term Byzantine, but it is a convenient term for us modern people to clearly distinguish the differences of the Greek cultured Roman Empire that evolved after the capital was moved to Byzantium/Constantinople from the Latin Empire of Rome (heck, even the crusader takeover of the Byzantines we call the "Latin Empire" since the Romans had become so Greek - Medieval Europeans would refer to them as the Greeks, since Rome was where the Pope lived). I find nothing wrong with using the term "Byzantine." I believe Dr. Fox's article (20 years old now, and out of date in terms of what the 'educated public' understands) gives away the problem of his own argument in his concluding paragraph. Periodization is something we historians place on the past and have been doing for centuries. It is artificial, and always will be. To change names to make things 'fit' adds another layer of unnecessary (and dare I say, Byzantine) complexity to history which will only muddle past scholarship. Sorry if I sound like I'm getting worked up over this: I'll blame the sauce. And frankly I shouldn't be saying anything, since I've already labeled myself a hypocrite...
To be honest, it really doesn't matter to me very much as I don't generally collect Byzantine era coins. But I will mention that most people, myself included, know of it as the Byzantine era and using Romaion could get confusing.
Give me "Byzantine". "Romaion" is too much like "Roman". Yes, I know there's a reason for that, but it seems to be a tad too scholarly a distinction for my tastes. As to "Dark Ages", I know that's become something of an obsolete phrase, and probably inaccurate, but I haven't broken myself of the habit of using it. It's colorful and interesting, if not entirely correct.
To draw a US coin comparison, they're more correctly called "Winged Liberty" dimes, but "Mercury" (sic) dime is the common usage, incorrect though it is. Sometimes a popular term just sticks, and I tend to go with the flow rather than being pedantic about it.
I'll admit, that never having seen the term "Romaion", I had to look the word up via a Google search yesterday. The Byzantine Empire was finished off in 1453. That is about the same time they lost the ability to tell anybody what to do or call them. If they wanted it different, they shouldn't have thrown the towel in and instead stuck around! History has labelled them "Byzantine" and that is the way it shall remain.
And therein lies the rub. If you're a regular person, the lesser-known term can prove confusing. If you're a scholar, and can distinguish between terms like "historical" and "historiographical", good for you. Go with "Romaion". Other smart people will understand you. (And there is certainly nothing wrong with being scholarly or smart.) But otherwise, for a general audience, "Byzantine" works. And is more likely to be understood. Being a non-specialized, "general practitioner" numismatist as I am, I prefer terminology the common man can understand. I sometimes show my coins (or their digital equivalent) to noncollectors or people who collect in different areas than mine. I don't want to shut them out by using difficult to understand terminology that only insiders might understand (though since I am rather wordy and longwinded, I do lose people sometimes). This is a reason I put Wikipedia links at the bottom of my writeups, for folks who might want to read more about a particular ruler or period in history that the coin represents. (Real scholars sneer at Wikipedia, too, but it's convenient, and sometimes written by scholars.) Anything I can do to make a coin more interesting to a wider audience, I'm all for it. It has inspired a few people to take an interest in some kinds of coins they otherwise would never have considered. I got two PMs with coin questions just this morning. And though my knowledge doesn't hold a candle to that of the specialists, I get the questions. Maybe because people know I'll try and break it down in a way they can understand (assuming I understand it myself, of course).
I say Byzantine Why stop there LM? Look at the U.S Indian head cent (IHC) It's no more an indian than it is a mercury.
Nice => Lord, apparently you're from my same era, where The Fonz was all that => those were good and far easier times, eh? (sit on it Potsie) Yah, not surprisingly => I'm a total fan of Byzantine rather then Romaninonian
Heyyyyyyy! Yep, that brings back some fond childhood memories. PS- I should add, however, that I apparently absorbed "Exactimundo" into my speech by osmosis so long ago that I had forgotten that it was a Fonzie quote! Thanks for the refresher. I adopted the late Jim Varney's "Ernest" character's habit of saying, "knowhutimean?", too. In fact, if you look back at my message board posts over the last 15 years, I always spell it that way, with the "u", and all crammed together. RIP, Jim Varney. You were one funny guy. Oh- and speaking of late and lamented funny guys, I also have been known to greet coworkers with Robin Williams' Mork the Ork character's split-fingered "Nanu Nanu!" greeting. Most of my coworkers are half my age and have no idea what that means, of course, but they already know I'm a nutcase, so they just smile and then go around the corner to hide and no doubt whisper about the weird old fat guy who talks funny and makes strange gestures.
Orfew provided the link to an argument against the word Byzantine that has the opposite effect convincing me that Byzantine is a good word. The term originated from 18th century French desires to separate their beloved hardly civilized civilization they termed Byzantine. The average Byzantine Emperor does tend to make you appreciate all but the Caligula/Elagabalus grade Romans. I might not have felt the need to go back to the pre-Constantinian term but I do like separating the Rome centered universe from the Constantinople crowd. Romaion is too close for a made up word for the convenience of history teachers. I'll stick with Byzantine.