Im no pro but from my experience a grade is First and foremost all about original luster … the more sheen on a coins obverse the higher the grade… then start deducting points for blemishes bag marks ect.. This is why is almost impossible to grade a coin from a single photo - to be accurate you really need the specimen in hand with the right lighting and a magnifying glass - but if you insist to grade via photos then you need much higher quality photos and different lighting angles. Otherwise your literally grading in the blind / dark .. whatever love the coins and with you well
They are common, except for higher UNC grades: https://coinappraiser.com/coins/value-of-1924-peace-silver-dollar/
They were a lot worse when I pulled them out. They both where spotted with unattractive toning, they look much better now after being dipped.
I’m with the horsey guy here. They look like nice Gem MS examples to me, though I’ll confess the relatively low relief on Peace dollars gives me some difficulty, and I’m not very confident when grading them. My initial, reflexive reaction was MS64 if not 65 on the first coin (the 1925), and the second one (the 1924) looks even more mark-free. So since @eddiespin already went out on the limb and said MS65/MS66, I will concur.
