Let's see your newest acquisitions!

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by H8_modern, Feb 25, 2011.

  1. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    I like the overall great strike. In some cases, the strong steps seem to come at the expense of somewhere (or everywhere) else. This coin is simply terrific all over.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

  4. Millard

    Millard Coindog Supporter

    Thanks for pointing the VAM 4 out Barney. I missed that.
     
    Barney McRae likes this.
  5. Millard

    Millard Coindog Supporter

  6. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Well-Known Member

  7. Millard

    Millard Coindog Supporter

     
  8. Millard

    Millard Coindog Supporter

    58 is what I thought too, but you can always hope for better! :D
     
    Barney McRae likes this.
  9. Millard

    Millard Coindog Supporter

    And the photo doesn't show it but there is just a hint of copper toning at 9 oclock, and a bit more at 3 oclock.
     
  10. Millard

    Millard Coindog Supporter

    these photos are from my phone, and show the toning better that the photos on the computer.
    20241011_144843.jpg 20241011_144814.jpg
     
  11. Millard

    Millard Coindog Supporter

    Sorry Barnie but I've confused two coins. I thought you were looking at the 1903 O. Not the 1894 0. My apologies.
     
  12. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Well-Known Member

    The 1903 O looks MS+ to me. The 1894 O looks AU58 or better. Photos are hard to judge. And I missed seeing the O on the 1894. While it's still a great coin, a P in that condition is what blew my mind. :D
     
  13. Millard

    Millard Coindog Supporter

    I upgraded to the 94 O from an XF. But it has a scuff just above the eye. I'd be happy with AU58. Still chasing the 94P.
     
    Barney McRae likes this.
  14. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Well-Known Member

    I did not notice the scuff until you pointed it out. But you never know what grader you'll get. Some let bagmarks/scuffs slide as a MS deduction point, some call it circulation wear. PCGS seems to let little things slide if the coin has few flaws and great luster, whereas the stuff I send to ANACS gets technically graded stricter. Go figure.
     
    Millard likes this.
  15. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Baggy cheek but I'll bet it looks better in hand. From your photogs the piece looks 'proof like'. Very nice.
     
    Barney McRae and Millard like this.
  16. okbustchaser

    okbustchaser I may be old but I still appreciate a pretty bust Supporter

    A two-faced hussy
    upload_2024-10-13_14-45-56.png
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2024
  17. Jamy Smith

    Jamy Smith Member

    D on top, S on bottom with a P in middle;
    Happy to grab this lot at $16/ea on auction
    IMG_0594.jpeg IMG_0595.jpeg
     
  18. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Well-Known Member

    That is one SERIOUSLY nice quarter! Not only full head but full nipple! lol Very nice!
     
    chlorinated, lordmarcovan and Millard like this.
  19. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    Great looking coin!
     
  20. fiddlehead

    fiddlehead Well-Known Member

    1853/2 Sweet AU50 w CAC certification. Missing piece in my type one collection. Been waiting for a good piece that fit my collection.

    1853-2 obverse AU50 CAC.jpg
     

    Attached Files:

  21. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    1822 Coronet cent, N-6, PCGS AU58 BN.

    Considering the present PCGS trend price shown on the cert page is $1,700 (which admittedly seems high), I thought the seller’s $935 asking price (with free shipping) was reasonable for this one. I didn’t even try to haggle.

    IMG_9564.jpeg
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page