1942 Mercury

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by BBBeth, Sep 27, 2024.

  1. BBBeth

    BBBeth Active Member

    A new find. Not the 1969-S DDO: however just as exciting. 1942 o 1941 obverse.png 1942 o 1941 reverse.png 1942 o 1941.png
     
    dollar, Michael K, eddiespin and 8 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Histman

    Histman Too Many Coins, Not Enough Time!

    When you say "find" what do you mean? In circulation or something you picked up from a seller?
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  4. BBBeth

    BBBeth Active Member

    It was purchased in a pile of mixed 90% silver dimes (roughly 25 rolls).
     
  5. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    BBBeth and Heavymetal like this.
  6. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    My question as well. Being a valuable variety, 1942/1, you would almost have to think it was not a new find from circulation. More info needed…imo…Spark
    @BBBeth
     
    BBBeth and SensibleSal66 like this.
  7. Spark1951

    Spark1951 Accomplishment, not Activity

    Well, a newly found ( existing, previously discovered) variety, if authenticated and slabbed, this one looks to be between XF45 and AU50 according to PCGS Photograde, which makes it a $600+ coin. Very fortuitous find! Keep us in the loop on what you do with it.
    …imo…Spark
     
    BBBeth likes this.
  8. Paddy54

    Paddy54 Well-Known Member

    Nice find however it has cleaned and more in the F/VF in grade range.
     
    BBBeth likes this.
  9. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    It’s not a 1942 but rather a 1942/41. It’s an overdate and on the costly side. Looks very genuine to me and it’s hard to believe you found it in a roll. Congratulations and protect it. :)
     
    BBBeth likes this.
  10. Inspector43

    Inspector43 More than 75 Years Active Collecting Supporter

    Nice.
     
    BBBeth likes this.
  11. johnmilton

    johnmilton Well-Known Member

    The 1942 over 1 over date is worth a lot more than any doubled die you might think you are seeing. This is an error in die preparation. It takes three blows for a working hub to make a working die. This working die was made with one or two blows from a 1941 hub and then a third one from a 1942 hub. It’s been popular for years. There is also a 1942 over 1 Denver Mint version as well.
     
    imrich, eddiespin and BBBeth like this.
  12. BBBeth

    BBBeth Active Member

    I agree. My excitement after finding this beauty in a pile of 90%s created the typo. This is not a discovery find. I have been searching silver for years for one of these. Finally.
     
    SensibleSal66 and eddiespin like this.
  13. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    Well aren't you particular. :)
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  14. Heavymetal

    Heavymetal Well-Known Member

    I think there is a counterfeit of this famous piece. I have no opinion on your coin
     
    BBBeth and SensibleSal66 like this.
  15. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    Nice score. Does it weigh correctly? It looks right.
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  16. BBBeth

    BBBeth Active Member

    It's light by .05 (2.45 g). Now I'm questioning it's authenticity and how it was found.
     
  17. BBBeth

    BBBeth Active Member

    That why I posted it in this forum. I'm 50/50 on if it's a fake.
     
  18. BBBeth

    BBBeth Active Member

    Heavymetal likes this.
  19. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    It looks genuine to me and .05 is acceptable, within tolerance and it’s also circulated enough to loose a little weight. If you sent it to a TPG it would be fine.
     
    Spark1951 and -jeffB like this.
  20. Michael K

    Michael K Well-Known Member

    .05 is not an issue. It looks as if it had been cleaned, also not that
    big of a deal if genuine, as this would be a monster find. Let's see if the real ones have that extra nub on the number 4. Yes it does. Yours looks good.
     
    eddiespin and KBBPLL like this.
  21. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    I don't see any reason to doubt authenticity. The Chinese fakes of these are horrible and altered dates are usually easy to spot.
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page