That is too wacky to formulate a meaningful reply. But one other point is that even though you might "own" the land, somebody else might own the mineral rights and water rights. So somebody else might be able to come and legally take the gold (and oil and water and whatever) from the land you supposedly own.
Sigh..... I now understand the dilemma: a lack of interpreting that wacky fellow Sir Thomas, to wit; An arguable posit is in doubt of accomplishment, when received by a body aswoon with the glitter of Gold. God Keep You Well.
At some point this thread went from debating the merits of "gold is going up therefore run out and buy some" to increasingly esoteric debates of the merits of land ownership. Just an observation; do with that what you will.
When a person can not articulate and support their premise with reason anymore, after multiple illogical logic attempts, the person seeks refuge in condescending elementary school taunts, hoping that the recipient is his new huckleberry. Alas, your methodology is the same it was in 2011. It is not of value and is a waste of non-connected neurons.