New Daniel Carr Morgan Dollar

Discussion in 'Coin Chat' started by jwitten, Oct 8, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Great! I'm going to go make some copies too now. Sell em and make me some money! Sweet! Oh, but I'll just say I'm doing it for my own enjoyment... promoting the hobby, honoring the original and such.
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    Are you taking requests? If you're going to make them with the same quality as @dcarr, then I'd like an 1886-CC, 1887-CC and 1888-CC, please. :) Preferably DMPLs. ;)
     
    Dave Waterstraat and Cascade like this.
  4. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    Okay, but do the laws state the design is a free for all to use however they see fit?
     
  5. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    It means you're free to copy the design.
     
  6. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Paul M. likes this.
  7. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

  8. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    I saw it, and considered it, but passed. Jump on it if you like it. There's something weird going on with it behind her portrait at 4:30pm
     
  9. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    Thanks but I realey don't like Morgans
     
  10. BooksB4Coins

    BooksB4Coins Newbieus Sempiterna

    I very much respect your position on the matter, Paul, but its not as simple as that and you know it.
     
  11. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    :D
     
  12. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    I can probably draw one for ya!
     
  13. physics-fan3.14

    physics-fan3.14 You got any more of them.... prooflikes?

    There was a series of threads on the NGC forums recently where a member (who works in the law profession) posted a serious legal analysis of Dcarr's work. He included many applicable citations as well as referenced case law. He made a very convincing argument, in my opinion. I would encourage you to read those threads. Every point he made was, of course, countered by Dcarr - but very unconvincingly and using fallacious arguments. The end result was: what Dcarr is doing is in clear violation of the law.
     
  14. Paul M.

    Paul M. Well-Known Member

    Links for the lazy?
     
  15. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    I saw that. I thought Dan defended himself quite adequately........
     
  16. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    '

    Lol pretzel logic.

    What humors me the most about this is you and the angry old men in your group throw away every belief you supposedly have because you're angry and don't like it
     
  17. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    Never had an issue with you in the past, @baseball21, but so far in this thread you've looped me into a group who is "crying," "angry" and "old." So here's a little about myself, so you can get to know me a little better.
    1. I'm not that old. I'm 38.
    2. Last time I was truly angry - driving on I-81.
    3. Last time I cried - watching the end of Saving Private Ryan. WHO DOESN'T? (And it was more of a solemn weeping). :)
     
  18. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    I don't see how these have anything to do with art. It's all done with machines. Sure it takes skill to run the machines but I don't see it as art.
     
    Coinchemistry 2012 likes this.
  19. ldhair

    ldhair Clean Supporter

    Not a great choice of words.
     
  20. baseball21

    baseball21 Well-Known Member

    Read back. I am in my 30s as well, people are blasting carr and defending a soup can painting. No other way to put it. I'm just done caring and enjoy calling people out at this point. It is far to easy
     
  21. C-B-D

    C-B-D Well-Known Member

    It doesn't sound like you're "done caring and calling people out," when you're still throwing passive insults and assumptions around. Or are you done starting.... now?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page