GTG: 1915 Pan Pac Commemorative Half

I am going to have to say Au 58

Sent from my A463BG using Tapatalk

 

Log in or Sign up to hide this ad.

I'm going to (perhaps foolishly) go against the grain. My first thought was AU something and I'm sticking with that, AU-55, thinking it may have been slabbed a while back. It is a very pretty coin, and the second set of images put it in a better light. I'll be happy to be way off base.
Steve

 

I didn't see the second set of images. I'll stick with my guess. If it is UNC, then it is 65*

 

I have seen a few sites cheaper than I paid but I mostly paid for the color and the potential. I like it and I don't think it will be trading hands any time soon.

 

I would love to have a TruVideo or whatever they decided to call of it of this coin and many others I have. It is hard to believe they don't have something like that already for high dollar coins and coins with color. People with coins that exceed my income would probably love this idea even more than I would.

 

I'll say 65

 

66

 

Your coin should grade MS 64. Mine was certified at AU 58 and has no patina.

 

The grade is......... UNC Details-Questionable color Cert number: 81115729

 

You got hosed

 

I didn't submit it actually, I bought it holdered this way. I think I got a great deal on it really as I paid only about $50 more than APMEX is asking for a white Pan-Pac in AU. This one might go back to PCGS or possibly NGC.

 

It's a beautiful coin. I would have it displayed on my nightstand in front of my wife's picture.

 

Was this the coin that had an MS 62 label. If so, it definitely has a chance to be back in a 62 or 63 holder.

 

Look on PCGS Coinfacts at all the trueviews. If this one is AT, then they all are.

 

Beautiful Coin!

 

I paid $490 for my PCGS AU 58 last December, 2015 from L & C coins for anyone who wants to know.

 

From greattoning on EBay this summer yeah it was. I think I can get it in a 63 or possibly 64 holder. It may go to NGC as I don't want another details holder.

 

I was watching it (thus I refrained from guessing the grade).
From what I have heard/read on the the various forums, NGC is tougher on toning lately so sending it to PCGS might be the better option (although I have no personal experience...the closest thing I have done is send an ex NGC artificial toning classic commem to Anacs where it deservingly, in my opinion, received a straight grade).

 

Pcgs not ngc. Ngc is ridiculously hard on coins with any hint of color. If you want a better chance at a straight grade it's pcgs all the way!

 

Love this classic image. On both sides. I wish THIS could be a new quarter design..