GTG 1968-S Jefferson Nickel (NGC)

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Lehigh96, Mar 20, 2024.

?

Guess the Assigned Grade

  1. AU58

  2. MS60-64

  3. MS65

  4. MS66

  5. MS67

  6. MS68

  7. Other (Please Explain in Comments)

  8. 5FS

  9. NOT FS

  10. + Grade

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Well, you were the closest.

    [​IMG]

    I think you guys got fooled by the size of the photos. I don't think I am going to use such large photos in my future gtg threads.
     
    Mr.Q and Dima like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Holy Toledo! MS67, WOW....
    Yea, probably the size. wink.png
     
  4. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

    I was looking at the marks on the obverse. Are they planchet flaws?
     
  5. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    They're marks. Just overlooked.
     
  6. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    Wow. I'm really surprised. The mark on the reverse below "CENTS" alone seems too big for a 67.
     
    ddddd and Mr. Numismatist like this.
  7. bsowa1029

    bsowa1029 Franklin Half Addict

    I guessed 66 5FS.
    The steps do appear to just miss FS but I think that’s because the photos are so good and can be enlarged many times the actual size of a nickel. I think in person, without magnification, NGC gave it 5FS.

    Edited to add: I made my guess before seeing the reveal. Also, the full slab photo does make the coin look better than the cropped versions. Every minute mark is magnified in the cropped photos.
     
  8. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    That was my thinking as well; without that one mark, 67 makes sense but with it, I'm not as convinced.
     
  9. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    That mark on the upper cheek should preclude this coin from grading any higher than '64.........MHO
     
  10. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    It depends, some are planchet flaws, some are marks. For example, on the cheek and jaw are planchet roughness, behind the mouth is a mark.

    I am in agreement, as can be seen from my vote in the poll.

    If I were the grader, this would be my grade. The unwritten rules of the TPG are that you can have "one" area of weakness as long as it isn't under the 3rd pillar, that the 5th step is complete, and that the overall step detail is strong. This coin has great overall step detail, a complete 5th step, but the area of weakness which is a bridge of the 4th and 5th step falls under the 3rd pillar. My problem is that the steps on this coin look better than almost every other 68-S FS in existence. When it is this close, I am an optimistic grader and lean towards giving the strike designation. Whoever graded this did not agree.

    I agree, this coin would look better with a 66 numerical grade.
     
    ddddd likes this.
  11. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Wow was I wrong, sorry. Beautiful Jeffy.
     
  12. green18

    green18 Unknown member Sweet on Commemorative Coins

    Subjective reasoning on the part of the third party grader doesn't always make you wrong.......buy the coin and not the holder, and do follow your heart. :)
     
    Mr.Q likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page