Another GTG 1881 Morgan

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by numist, Mar 11, 2024.

  1. numist

    numist Member Supporter

    IMG_20240311_170221568~2.jpg IMG_20240311_170127406~2.jpg So much fun everyone is doing it ! Title should be: 1881-S
     
    Cheech9712, Barney McRae and Mr.Q like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Inspector43

    Inspector43 More than 75 Years Active Collecting Supporter

  4. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    No comment on grade but I like all Morgans anyway.
     
  5. Mr. Numismatist

    Mr. Numismatist Strawberry Token Enthusiast

    I'm thinking the slab says MS-64.

    But, if it wasn't a 1881-S it would be MS-65 in my opinion.
     
  6. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Well-Known Member

    Funny you say that. I too have noticed TPGs practice DEI depending on year, model, and make. They let an awful lot slide on depending on the year, mint and conditional rarity. That being said, that's a gem of a coin.
     
    Mr. Numismatist likes this.
  7. Coins4Eli

    Coins4Eli Collector of Early American Copper

    I could not agree more.
     
    numist and Mr. Numismatist like this.
  8. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    numist likes this.
  9. the scratch on the front unless it's on the capsule puts it at a 63 for my guess?
     
  10. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    MS 63....the cheek/chin has me hedging downward but it might be something on the holder/photo
     
  11. mrweaseluv

    mrweaseluv Supporter! Supporter

    that's a tough call 81s's are probably the most undergraded of all morgans. That said I would GTG on the slab at a MS64
    but...
    with those beautiful cartwheels on both obv/rev, very nice frosting on the reverse... and seemingly very smooth/reflective fields... any other year that coin would border on PL but as an 81s I strongly doubt it wears a PL
     
    numist likes this.
  12. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

  13. SilverMike

    SilverMike Well-Known Member

  14. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

  15. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Well-Known Member

    This is why I don't usually chime in. You can't tell from a photo if there is any wear on a coin if the lighting is obscuring the breast feathers on a Morgan. The hair on the obverse is usually the indicator. But many Morgans had a weak strike. And years when there were hoards of coins suddenly on the market, the TPGs seemed to started comparing them with the rest of that year and mint's population of known UNC coins. Imagine being the male captain of the Swedish Bikini Team. You suddenly start raising your standards and get pickier?:p
     
  16. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Agree. Except the part about raising standards. I would just be happy to be part of the team, if I was single that is. lol.gif
    As far as the coin? I also agree on it being difficult to grade by photo's alone. Must be in hand. JMHO.
     
    Barney McRae likes this.
  17. Barney McRae

    Barney McRae Well-Known Member

    I'll bet there isn't one person here who will argue the point that the TPGs give more leeway to Morgan CCs and the 1893-95 coins as far as leniency. We all know it, it's just not talked about in polite company.:p
     
    SensibleSal66 likes this.
  18. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    Well. I'm just not polite company sometimes. LOL. twisted.gif twisted.gif twisted.gif
     
    Barney McRae likes this.
  19. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

  20. longshot

    longshot Enthusiast Supporter

    Eagle's breast looks weak for the date. But 64.
     
    numist likes this.
  21. numist

    numist Member Supporter

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page