Jefferson Nickel: Full Steps or NOT?

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Lehigh96, Dec 15, 2023.

?

Is this Jefferson Nickel Full Steps or NOT?

  1. Yes--FS

  2. NO--NOT FS

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    Similar to a guess the grade thread, in this thread we will only focus on the steps. Are they full steps or not?

    [​IMG]

    Please vote in the attached poll. I will not divulge the date/mm or grade of the coin, but I will say that it is a war nickel. And remember, full steps = five full steps.

    As always, opinions welcome!
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Randy Abercrombie

    Randy Abercrombie Supporter! Supporter

  4. Coins4Eli

    Coins4Eli Collector of Early American Copper

    I vote no. The bottom steps are mushy. :)
     
  5. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    The bottom step appears to be incomplete. No in my opinion.
     
  6. SensibleSal66

    SensibleSal66 U.S Casual Collector / Error Collector

    The bottom step is "mushy". I'm going up the handicapped route since I walk with a cane. Sorry. lol.gif
     
    Randy Abercrombie and PamR like this.
  7. PamR

    PamR You Never Know! Supporter

    From what I have learned and have seen, I say yes. But hey who am I? lol! Pretty!
     
    Randy Abercrombie likes this.
  8. dwhiz

    dwhiz Collector Supporter

    I say YES, I've much worst with FS
     
    Randy Abercrombie and PamR like this.
  9. PamR

    PamR You Never Know! Supporter

    I look at it as I read about some, you can see five full steps. Did not say it had to be all across. Extra nice no doubt if it were. :)
     
  10. Morgandude11

    Morgandude11 As long as it's Silver, I'm listening

    Absolutely is full steps, unless you work for NGC.
     
  11. Anthony Mazza

    Anthony Mazza Well-Known Member

    It's 5 fs
     
    PamR likes this.
  12. PamR

    PamR You Never Know! Supporter

    Oh oh!
     
  13. RonSanderson

    RonSanderson Supporter! Supporter

    I am going with yes. I think the marks across the top 4 steps don’t rise to the level of preventing full steps.
     
  14. Sting 60

    Sting 60 Well-Known Member

    It might be full steps but it isn't 5 full. :pompous:
     
  15. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

    I don't understand that comment. If a coin has full steps, by definition, it must have 5 full steps. PCGS requires five full steps for their FS designation, whereas NGC has both a 5FS and 6FS designation.
     
  16. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

  17. Lehigh96

    Lehigh96 Toning Enthusiast

  18. ddddd

    ddddd Member

    it's no from me ....6/5/4/5 ....area under the third column has enough of a break to prevent the designation
     
    Randy Abercrombie likes this.
  19. CamaroDMD

    CamaroDMD [Insert Clever Title]

    I've got it 6-5-4-5. It's very close under the third column but I have it as a no. That said, I wouldn't be surprised if a TPG gives a FS but I would say it just misses it.
     
  20. kSigSteve

    kSigSteve Active Member

    I do agree with the two above even on their exact designation for each column. 6-5-4-5 all day.
     
  21. eddiespin

    eddiespin Fast Eddie

    I think this one's real close because the center part looks good and the only weak part, just to the right of center, doesn't go all the way through, especially on that 4th step. I gave it a no. Still, those are strong steps, especially on the silver-alloy, and that should be noted, the way I look at it. It just won't get the nod for 5, I don't think.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2023
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page