possible 1961 nickel error? please help.

Discussion in 'Error Coins' started by joes, Feb 3, 2016.

  1. joes

    joes New Member

    i came across this 1961 nickel in OK condition. On the reverse the monticello has a strange spiral pretty much dead center of the coin. Does anyone know what this is or have any ideas. 20151202_150628_resized.jpg 20151202_150643_resized.jpg 20151202_150650_resized.jpg 20151202_150712_resized.jpg
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. furryfrog02

    furryfrog02 Well-Known Member

    Not an error. Post Mint Damage. What made it, I couldn't tell you but it didn't come from the mint like that.
     
  4. joes

    joes New Member

    ok, thanks. thats what i thought, just wanted to be sure.
     
  5. sunnydaze

    sunnydaze New Member

    I have a 1961 nickle that has a crack in washingtons hair - it does not appear to be damaged anywhere else - how do I find out if it is a mint error or not
     
  6. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    You would be better off posting full size photos in a new thread so that others can answer your question. Die cracks are a result of the striking process, some call them errors. None of them though are valuable. Unless they are a die marker for a die variety.
     
  7. Collecting Nut

    Collecting Nut Borderline Hoarder

    It’s called damage. I’ve seen it on other nickels as well. Not an error of any type.
     
  8. lordmarcovan

    lordmarcovan 48-year collector Moderator

    Damage, likely from some kind of coin rolling machine. One sees this fairly often.
     
    Kevin Mader likes this.
  9. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast Supporter

    I kind of assumed it was created by turning the knob on a coin operated 'candy' machine. You'll note that this damage appears only on older coins and not more modern coinage (or so it appears).
     
    lordmarcovan likes this.
  10. Pickin and Grinin

    Pickin and Grinin Well-Known Member

    Just a reminder to the past three posters this thread is 7 years old.
    @sunnydaze revived it.
     
    Kevin Mader likes this.
  11. Kevin Mader

    Kevin Mader Fellow Coin Enthusiast Supporter

    Indeed. Here’s my thinking on a revived thread:
    • If it’s to answer the original poster, they should probably pass
    • If it’s to expand on information presented or to clarify something, they probably should.
    • If it’s for a like issue, it depends.
      • For unique type items, I generally feel ok about adding to a thread.
      • If it’s a common type item, a new thread seems most appropriate.
    No hard rules to this, just a feel thing for me. I like it when members use the Search tool before dropping a question. I hate to penalize them for reviving a thread after a fair effort.

    All good!
     
    Heavymetal likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page