The only thing worse is being second, 'cause I gotta explain why. Guessing 62 light strike field marks, does that sound like I know what I'm talking about? Because I don't. Thanks for your indulgence.
Something about it looks like it might have been cleaned or over dipped. It could be UNC Details...otherwise MS 62
Typical weak strike for the coin. No real signs of wear but a few dark spots and those small bag marks hold it back. MS-62, maybe 63 on a good day.
OK, completely off the subject, but why is there a V in TRVST? I know a V is a U in Romen or Latin. But why in an English motto? WE use a U on US currency. Sorry, for the rant, but it's been buggin me for years!!
This is one of the most frequently asked questions about United States coins. All Peace Dollars (1921-1935) use the Deco stylized Roman “V” (U) which looks like the English “V”. This was a common style of the time and can be found on buildings as well as coins. It's a stylistic consideration, not a Mint error.
I bet he doesn't like 3CN's, V Nickels or HR St Gaudens either. The coin shown here is lightly circulated, IMO, and I don't think there's a chance the surfaces are original. There are hints on both obverse and reverse as to what was forcibly and chemically removed from the surfaces.
I believe I see exactly what Dave is talking about. AU Details. I'll be curious to see how this one comes out.