Make the Comitatenses great again!

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by Magnus Maximus, Jul 16, 2016.

  1. Valentinianvs

    Valentinianvs Well-Known Member

    Unfortunatelly I dont have any Miliarense yet :( Its a great hole in my collection
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Magnus Maximus

    Magnus Maximus Dulce et Decorum est....

    Valentinianvs likes this.
  4. ValiantKnight

    ValiantKnight Well-Known Member

    Here's my best Valentinian I :

    [​IMG]

    Hopefully this is cool for your thread too @Magnus Maximus

    [​IMG]
     
  5. John Anthony

    John Anthony Ultracrepidarian

    Nice thread! I enjoyed the history, congratulations on a superb siliqua, and I've got Hughes's book on my list now. I'll go with a coin I haven't posted before, although it's Valentinian II, an AE2 of Antioch...

    val 6.jpg
     
  6. Magnus Maximus

    Magnus Maximus Dulce et Decorum est....

  7. ValiantKnight

    ValiantKnight Well-Known Member

  8. Alegandron

    Alegandron "ΤΩΙ ΚΡΑΤΙΣΤΩΙ..." ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ, June 323 BCE

    Taint a bad one you upgraded from!
     
  9. Magnus Maximus

    Magnus Maximus Dulce et Decorum est....

    @Alegandron I'm sorry but can you explain what you mean? Not trying to be thick headed, I just don't understand what you said.
     
  10. Pishpash

    Pishpash Well-Known Member

    Should be apostrophe after the T T'aint = it isn't.....
     
  11. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    You need to have a language class in American Southern.
     
  12. Alegandron

    Alegandron "ΤΩΙ ΚΡΑΤΙΣΤΩΙ..." ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ, June 323 BCE

    LOL, True Bubba! True...

    MagMax... I was saying that your ORIGINAL coin that you upgraded from was a good coin. I like it.

    Aint you from N'Awlins?
     
    Bing likes this.
  13. Alegandron

    Alegandron "ΤΩΙ ΚΡΑΤΙΣΤΩΙ..." ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ, June 323 BCE

    Naw, thats too much work! Those postrofee thangs! :D
     
    Pishpash and Bing like this.
  14. Valentinianvs

    Valentinianvs Well-Known Member

    ValiantKnight likes this.
  15. Magnus Maximus

    Magnus Maximus Dulce et Decorum est....

    For the part were I said only a select few Emperors led troops into battle, I intentionally left off Magnentius as he is /was considered a usurper. Though I somehow forgot to add Valens to the list, he did lead troops an a few occasions most notably at the disaster at Adrianople.
     
  16. ValiantKnight

    ValiantKnight Well-Known Member

    Thank you for the kind words Valentinianvs :)
     
    Valentinianvs likes this.
  17. Alegandron

    Alegandron "ΤΩΙ ΚΡΑΤΙΣΤΩΙ..." ΜΕΓΑΣ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔΡΟΣ, June 323 BCE

    Agreed. But Marius was a "New Man", who fought to gain Senatorial Rank... but, yeah, that is correct.

    The reason for my thought, and not to be cruel for the times: The Roman Republic Legions WON an Empire... The Late Empire Legions LOST an Empire.

    And, NO, I am NOT opening a debate or shooting across any bow. Just an observation. I know folks enjoy the Late Empire time period as you do. I just look at the whole historical picture of the Roman Entity (Village, City, Republic, Empire, transferring power to Constantinople, etc.) and find the slow waning and finally the light extinguished from an Awesome Entity (The Western portion) is so sad. From the traditional founding of Rome in 753 BCE to the last of the Roman direct legacy with Constantinople falling in 1453 CE... over 2000 years of Roman Empire is fascinating. Yup, China was maybe 3000 years, but was many States. India was a long rich, history. Egypt was THOUSANDS of years, but Rome seemed to have captured a pinnacle for Human achievement whose legacy strongly influences many peoples worldwide even today. Just cool.

    In honor of the 4 major Human Entities that I mentioned:

    RR AR Didrachm 280-275 Mars-Horse FIRST.JPG
    Roman Republic
    AR Didrachm 280-275 BCE
    Obv: Mars
    Rev: Horse Head ROMANO
    FIRST Silver coin of the Roman Republic

    China Qin 220-180 BC AE 12 Zhu Ban Liang Blank H7-7 O-R.JPG
    China
    Qin Dynasty 220-180 BC
    AE Zhu Ban Liang
    Blank
    H7-7
    Emperor Qin united China, with the name China derived from his name

    India- Shakya Janapada AR 5-Shana 6th-5th C BCE Buddha Ref-Hiramo-I-8-29 Obv-Rev.jpg
    India, Shakya Janapada
    AR 5-Shana 6th-5th C BCE
    Probably struck at the time Buddha was the Prince of Shakya
    Ref-Hiramo-I-8-29

    Egypt SCARAB Thuthmosis III ca 1504-1450 BCE ex CNG ex Hendin.JPG
    Egypt
    Steatite SCARAB
    Pharoah Thuthmosis III
    ca 1504-1450 BCE
    ex CNG
    ex David Hendin
     
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2016
  18. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    I have to agree with Brian. For me, at least, there is something about the early Roman legions that inspire the imagination. The later legions, again for me, do not. But then again, my favorite time period for collecting is from 150AD backwards.
     
    Alegandron likes this.
  19. ValiantKnight

    ValiantKnight Well-Known Member

    To be fair, circumstances were different. Drop the Republican army in 400 or 476 AD and they might not fair as well as you think.

    I like the Republican era, but it just simply doesn't capture my interest as the Late Empire. I know I'm in the minority and that I'm probably not taken seriously by other collectors as a result but whatever. I don't see myself changing my interests and I am glad to know specialists in this area of collecting.
     
    Alegandron likes this.
  20. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

    I don't know of anyone that doesn't take you seriously. I respect your knowledge of the era in which you collect. I suspect most CTers do as well.
     
  21. Orfew

    Orfew Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus

    I think it is important to treat all collectors and their chosen collections with respect. The diversity of people and of collections is what provides interest, discussion and a sense of community.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page