A waste of a nice coin

Discussion in 'World Coins' started by Numismat, Jul 15, 2016.

  1. Numismat

    Numismat World coin enthusiast

  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    geez. that sucks. what an amazing coin too.:nailbiting::dead::nurse:
     
  4. rdwarrior

    rdwarrior Junior Member

    I doubt if the host coin is real. Somethings just don't look right.
     
  5. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER


    But, but, but, but..........what about all of the bidiots who think that all counterstamps are worth a premium?

    Chris
     
  6. Treashunt

    Treashunt The Other Frank


    ditto
     
  7. onecenter

    onecenter Member

    amen
     
  8. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    not sure if the host coin is real or not. is it ? are some counter stamps real on these coins and are they worth a premium ?
     
  9. cpm9ball

    cpm9ball CANNOT RE-MEMBER

    I don't know either, but that isn't my point. Not too long ago, there was a discussion on another thread about counterstamps and their value.

    Chris
     
    spirityoda likes this.
  10. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    after looking at my 19th century Krause 4th edition catalog. this coin looks to be a Crown KM#675 silver.... gold plated maybe ??? the years start at 1818-1822 and thee only gold 1 that looks like this is dated 1818 gold pattern not sure if this coin is legit or not... the date has thrown me way off. I am getting a red flag, but I do not know enough about these coins to be sure. have the Great Britain coin collectors chime in any time now...
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2016
  11. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    I know some legit counter stamps bring value. they just have to be looked at closer maybe. ?
     
  12. Numismat

    Numismat World coin enthusiast

    It's a gold sovereign. Could be one of the recent generation of Chinese counterfeits, they do gold as well. There is some loss of sharpness that you would expect to see on genuine examples, but nothing blatantly wrong details wise for me to call it a fake from just the photos. That c/s though, not only looks modern, but it's not even of a style that would have been used contemporary to the coin. It's incuse for one thing.
     
  13. spirityoda

    spirityoda Coin Junky

    what about the date ?
     
  14. Numismat

    Numismat World coin enthusiast

    That's the other thing. Napoleon's rule ended in 1814. Yet this counterstamp of his effigy is on an 1817 dated coin
     
  15. PaddyB

    PaddyB Eccentric enthusiast

    I think you were on the wrong page in Krause. This is purporting to be a Gold Sovereign of 1817, Krause #674, about 3 pages later in my 7th edition.

    As to authenticity:
    1. The coin looks a bit off - the surface of the horse's rump looks a little "bubbly" and not as natural as I would expect.
    2. Napoleon was defeated and exiled in 1815 - so waht would anyone be doing putting his bust on a coin at least 2 years later?
    3. Look at the seller's location. With all due respect to the honest traders in Poland I would be wary of anything being sold from Eastern Europe. What would such a coin be doing in that region anyway? A lot of Russian items of dubious veracity are shipped out through Eastern Europe so I would suspect it originated from there, whether the seller is aware of it or not.
     
  16. chrisild

    chrisild Coin Collector

    What would an ancient Greek or Roman coin do in North America? :rolleyes: Basically however I agree - would not buy such a piece from an eBay seller ...

    Christian
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page