I think this one surprised both the Seller and TPG- 1873-CC Trade$...

Discussion in 'US Coins Forum' started by Jack D. Young, Aug 31, 2023.

  1. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    A friend notified my Group of this listing (never mind the title:D):

    listing.jpg
    desc.jpg

    Interesting it was noted as "NOT ENCAPSULATED RESIDUE, CLEANED".

    TPG on-line cert; non-slabbed coins have no images:

    ert.jpg

    Listing images of the listed example; we can only assume it is the example submitted for grading:

    obv label.jpg
    rev label.jpg

    Key date, PCGS CoinFacts had some stats on these; noted only the type 1 reverse was used.

    type.jpg
    Rev Type.jpg

    So, this apparently was missed by both!

    Seller ended the auction and responded as follows:

    message.jpg

    Best, Jack.
     
    numist, KBBPLL, Heavymetal and 5 others like this.
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Mr.Q

    Mr.Q Well-Known Member

    Another one bites the dust, thanks Jack!
     
    David Betts, Jack D. Young and dwhiz like this.
  4. Cheech9712

    Cheech9712 Every thing is a guess

    Go get ‘‘em brother. Good catch. Just the fact that it’s not slabbed is enough to quit
     
  5. Mainebill

    Mainebill Bethany Danielle

    That’s a type 2 reverse. I spotted that instantly. No berry in claw. Total bad fake. Whole coin looks wrong anyway
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  6. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Any Trade expert able to tell me what date/ variety this is based on this reverse and mintmark?

    rev.jpg
     
  7. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    No expert but poking around PCGS both 1876 and 1877 have mint mark positions that look close. I'd bet on 1877-CC since it's the cheapest. The gouges around the MM make me wonder if it's been added though...
    205160836.jpg
     
    Jack D. Young likes this.
  8. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Great help as always @KBBPLL ! The "D" looks the same as well:

    CC's mark.jpg
     
    KBBPLL likes this.
  9. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    I'm perplexed. It doesn't look like a counterfeit to my eyes. So then I wonder if it's a sandwiched fake. But that doesn't make sense - you could quadruple the value of your 1873-P, but you'd have to destroy a valuable 1877-CC to do it.
     
  10. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    We need to look for more!
     
  11. KBBPLL

    KBBPLL Well-Known Member

    Have you considered that the certificate may not go with the coin? The coin and cert are loose so how do we know? Presumably one of the key points here is that NGC authenticated it but that doesn't seem certain to me. Are there other tells that the coin is fake, other than the wrong reverse type?
     
  12. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    I stated it is an assumption the coin goes with the label; I have asked if there is any other documentation.

    Not sure which obverse to compare it to- this may be as good as any...

    obv comp.jpg
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2023
  13. ksparrow

    ksparrow Coin Hoarder Supporter

    Looks like the 1877 C-1.2 in the Coxe book "The United States Trade Dollar Challenge 50 Set" p. 87.
    Pretty ludicrous fake with a T2 rev, egg on the NGC face just noting some "problems" without stating the obvious. D'oh!
     
  14. Jack D. Young

    Jack D. Young Well-Known Member

    Interested in any images from that book/ page @ksparrow !
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page