A possibly unpublished sestertius of Trajan Decius

Discussion in 'Ancient Coins' started by robinjojo, Aug 24, 2023.

  1. robinjojo

    robinjojo Well-Known Member

    From the current Harlan J Berk buy/bid sale:

    Trajan Decius, AE sestertius, Rome, 249-251 AD. PANNONIA reverse.

    RIC-124a; C-87

    15.56 grams

    Obverse: IMP C M Q TRAIANVS DECIVS AVG Bust laureate, cuirassed r.

    Reverse: P - A - NNONIA - E around, S - C across lower field, The two Pannonias standing side by side, both exceptionally looking left, both veiled and raising their right forearms; the one on the right holds a standard in her left arm, while a second standard is seen behind the raised right arm of the figure on the left.

    A possibly unpublished variety with both Pannonias looking left on a sestertius, though this variety is recorded on a few rare antoniniani. EF.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Avatar

    Guest User Guest



    to hide this ad.
  3. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    The coin is so heavily tooled (on both sides btw) it's impossible to tell if the right hand Pannoniae was facing left or right to begin with.

    Barry Murphy
     
  4. expat

    expat Remember you are unique, just like everyone else Supporter

    @robinjojo I have an antoninianus variety of it from a lot of 12 coins. It is quite heavily worn and has a thick green patina, and like yours, it is not possible to ascertain whether the right Pannoni is looking left, right or strait ahead.
    Presentation1.jpg
     
    Johndakerftw, paschka and Bing like this.
  5. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    So this coin is from the same dies, clearly showing a right facing Pannonia on the right and the extensive tooling....

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Barry Murphy
     
  6. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    hmmm photos didn't load. Let's try again.
    decius not tooled.jpg decius orig.jpg
     
  7. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    It's a bit shameful that Berk didn't call this coin tooled in their description, just EF.

    Barry
     
  8. GinoLR

    GinoLR Well-Known Member

    upload_2023-8-29_18-46-33.png
    On my modest antoninianus, they're looking in opposite directions.
     
  9. Bing

    Bing Illegitimi non carborundum Supporter

  10. robinjojo

    robinjojo Well-Known Member

    I do see indications of smoothing in the fields. Would you be more specific, with photos, of the tooling? I've gone over the coin with 20 power magnification, and I don't see any overt signs.

    The coin has been cleaned, most recently by me, with distilled water, to mitigate an area of deposit between the two figures.

    This coin must have been quite encrusted originally, and cleaned. The surfaces still retain much of the uneven brown and green deposits. The mechanical cleaning was very extensive. But as for tooling to create a left facing profile for the right figure, I simply do not seen signs of engraving, which would necessitate the removal of metal from the right facing profile and the creation of the left facing profile. Further, I would expect to see tooling marks that create a depression in the area where the right facing head was modified. A fair amount of metal would have be removed, and the left facing design added. There simply would not be enough of the head remaining to do a convincing, proportional rendering consistent with that of the left figure's head. Metal would have to be added, and that would mean heating the coin's surface to make the added metal bond properly. That process would also alter the entire surface of the coin, something that I do not see.

    I am not sure what you are referring to regarding the right hand. The surfaces are somewhat rough and the die engraving is not top notch, typical for this period, and as noted there has been cleaning/smoothing on both sides. Again, I don't see the removal or addition of features on the reverse figures, but maybe I'm missing something.

    Now I am the first one to admit that I might be mistaken, but this is my view of the matter.

    D-Camera Trajan Decius sestertius rev detail Rome 249-251AD PANNONIA 8-30-23.jpg

    D-Camera Trajan Decius sestertius rev detail 2 Rome 249-251AD PANNONIA 8-30-23.jpg
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2023
  11. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    I actually posted another coin from the same dies. Compare the two.

    Barry
     
    sand and Curtis like this.
  12. robinjojo

    robinjojo Well-Known Member

    I see the post with the two coins. They appear to me similar but not matched dies.
     
  13. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    They look like different dies due to the tooling. Match up key points.... shapes of arms, shapes of wreath tie, locations of letters etc. They are 100% the same dies. The Berk coin has really been destroyed with smoothing and tooling. FYI I showed the image to David Vagi without saying anything and his comment was "what a tooled POC."

    Barry
     
  14. robinjojo

    robinjojo Well-Known Member

    But how would the head for the right figure be modified from right to left? Tooling, as I understand it, is a technique of metal removal to enhance detail such as hair, but how would that be done, at a level of fine detail to change the orientation of a head?

    This same style head appears on this example, left figure:

    Trajan Decius SESTERTIUS 249-251 AD PANNONIAE 8-31-23.jpg

    As I mentioned earlier in this tread the coin has been smoothed. There are visible smoothing tool marks in the fields under magnification. It is clear that surfaces in the fields are uneven but homogenous in appearance.

    Also, what about the portrait on the obverse? Has that been tooled as well? Barry, you're the expert, so please show me where.

    Thanks
     
    Last edited: Aug 31, 2023
  15. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    On the Pannonia, the head has been completely tooled. The veil and the face are complete fabrications. On both figures, the drapery has been completely tooled from neck to ankles.

    On the obverse, the hairline on the forehead and temple has been strengthened, the eye tooled, the shoulder tooled, a beard has been added with irregular dashes that don't make sense, the mouth is tooled and the nose profile has been reshaped.

    Barry
     
    dltsrq and Broucheion like this.
  16. Barry Murphy

    Barry Murphy Well-Known Member

    Another from the same reverse die decius3.jpg decius orig.jpg
     
    dltsrq and Bing like this.
  17. robinjojo

    robinjojo Well-Known Member

    Thanks

    I'm in discussions with Aaron Berk about returning this coin for refund.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page